Politics
Out of context: Reply #12570
- Started
- Last post
- 33,770 Responses
- ukit0
"lift some of the racial discrimination stuff relating to jobs, business homes"
Not sure what you're talking about here. Rand Paul was taking issue with the Civil Rights Bill specifically.
"If you feel you have the right to decide the rights of someone wouldnt that mean reflexive property that they have the right to decide your rights."
Um...no? I mean the people deciding are Congress, that's what we elect them to do. Am I missing something here?
Why does every "libertarian" (as of last year) conservative think they know something the rest of us don't when it comes to this shit? When we understand these issues perfectly fine, we just don't see it in such simplistic terms. Arguing backwards from an inflexible philosophical stance isn't a viable way to run a country, or a business for that matter.
Being so absolutist in your viewpoint brings to mind other failed political philosophies, like Marxism ironically enough.
- really? Civil RIghts bill covers racial discrimination. and second is true. congress decides through mob rule.********
- hence the idea of certain inalienable rights that mob rule cant vote to take away********
- Proofread your shit before hitting "save" this makes zero sense.DrBombay
- and ya gotta get over the team terms man. with that kinda attitude you wont ever have an objective view********
- Rand Paul wants to join the "Mob" though, right?DrBombay
- ron paul joined the gov body yes. does he want to have mob rule style no.********
- He wants to be part of the mob ya dumb cunt.DrBombay
- Ron is a fuckin mobsterukit
- really? Civil RIghts bill covers racial discrimination. and second is true. congress decides through mob rule.