Politics
Out of context: Reply #12485
- Started
- Last post
- 33,770 Responses
- mathinc0
My Essay, titled 'Rick does the Backpedal'
'Your ignorance shines through daily around here, Love ya Tommy!'
'So you think he doesn't understand it. Probably one of the best lawyers in the World.'
'You people are fighting against the fact he hadnt read 10 pages but probably had a 10 hour meeting about it.'
'Man you have a hard on for the fact that he hasn't read it word for word.'
'I consulted one of our staff attorneys and he said "the AG isn't responsible to read every state law that is passed"'
Man you missed the point the whole time.. Holder opened the door to this, Holder questioned it's constitutionality (the law itself is a mirror of the Fed law on immigration), so he must have been talking about a States right to enforce the law that the Fed is ignoring. Or he could be talking about the ability for the police to racially profile (which is weird since this is a mirror of the Fed law, and actually this bill has even more protections against racial profiling..). But yet you're just trying to back pedal out of it acting like we didn't know this is a state law and therefore Holder didn't need to read it, thus our criticism was misplaced. Holder is completely in the wrong and doing a disservice to everyone by speaking on a law he knows nothing about. Go ahead and disagree with the law, but know something about it first. I'd be this pissed if it was a Democrat, Republican or Libertarian who pulled this bullshit. But you're not, you went and defended the actions tooth and nail, then when you found another angle ('oh it's not his responsibility to know about states law') you went with that.. which says a lot about your integrity and the homerism (http://www.urbandictionary.com... you show day in day out. Which is why I just can't post here anymore. I do really like you personally, we've had emails and been civil to each other but here I sat a whole half of a day fighting with someone who acts like a child when it comes to politics. I can debate a point and you just keep changing tactics, pick on my political choice of Libertarianism, call me an 'ignorant sack of shit' when grammatically I was right in my choice of words but ukit was actually wrong. You're just too one sided and it's a complete and total waste of time even having a different opinion than you do because you just keep swinging the hammer no matter what is put in front of you and frankly it's annoying, childish. So yeah man good luck I do hope you do well.. not get aids or die of cancer or any of the other dozen ill fates you've wished on people who also, don't agree with you.