Politics

Out of context: Reply #12481

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,770 Responses
  • DrBombay0

    You guys forgot for a bit that this is a state law we are talking about, didn't ya?

    DrBombay 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • I didn't... ... and I know math didn't - you do realize we're in the 'thick' of it out here - yes? (me in AZ... math in CA)PonyBoy
    • actually... tommy's in Tucson today - ground zero so-to-speakPonyBoy
    • I consulted one of our staff attorneys and he said "the AG isn't responsible to read every state law that is passed"DrBombay
    • So basically you guys are full of shit.DrBombay
    • THEN HE SHOULDN'T COMMENT ON IT... FOR - FUCKS - SAKE... what is wrong with you?!!!PonyBoy
    • How did you get to that conclusion Rick? If what you're saying is that Holder shouldn't have had to read it because he'smathinc
    • Fed and this is state.. then why is he out denouncing it? Why is he saying that his team is going to review it's constitutionality?mathinc
    • Besides Rick.. it's 10 pages. If he's going to comment on it.. read the 10 pages ffs. Why are you riding Holders nuts?mathinc
    • His team reviewing it's constitutionality IS his job.DrBombay
    • From what I read some guy asked him about it.DrBombay
    • The article I posted two pages ago has the 'some guy's' name.. like that makes a fucking difference.mathinc
    • It doesn't.DrBombay
    • amazing
      ********
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread