Politics

Out of context: Reply #12459

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,770 Responses
  • mathinc0

    Rick - 'Do you think he doesn't understand it? Honestly?'

    Here is what Holder said: "I have not had a chance to. I've glanced at it. I have not read it,"

    So let me get this straight, you think he understood the bill completely.. but never actually read the bill? It's a 10 page bill.. if it was longer than that I might not be as pissed off. So you think the AG got briefed? So our AG needed to get briefed on a 10 page bill.. he needed cliff notes to a 10 page bill.. are you fucking serious????

    mathinc 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • The fake outrage is in the house!DrBombay
    • Perhaps he was taken out of context? I see his quote about not reading the bill but a statement on how he felt about the bill and profiling.IRNlun6
    • Man you're a real treat Rick. Fake outrage? I'm really pissed actually. This is real outrage. What makes it worse is that justmathinc
    • because you have a 'side' in this, you don't have the moral integrity to say 'this is wrong'.mathinc
    • ... profiling. Either way if he did comment on a legal issue he din't read up on, then that's pretty tough to excuse.IRNlun6
    • You have a side in this, against the democrats at any cost. No nuts to declare GOP.DrBombay
    • Yet all you ever ever ever do is blame democrats for everything.DrBombay
    • Nope. Not true. It would be nice for you if it was that easy.mathinc
    • Your rants only go against democrats.DrBombay
    • Maybe you can mix some republican hate in, to keep up appearances.DrBombay
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread