Aperture 3
Out of context: Reply #8
- Started
- Last post
- 8 Responses
- dibec0
Meeklo. It's not subjective, it's actually my professional experience. I have used both, actually started out in Aperture. I will download the trail for 30 days and try it as I always do. I am not certain that is "subjective". We could argue that till our ears bleed.
Lightroom overall has better integration with all my tools, and not only my tools but others as well have shared this same experience. From my Canon products (Printer and Cameras) to other software applications. It has always worked and always has out performed Aperture in all regards, once again not only do I share this feeling but others have as well. Like I mentioned earlier Apple is always catching up with Adobe in regards to a strong and powerful photo editor. I have watched and experienced this happen from the first version release of Aperture to the beta days of Lightroom. Lightroom has always been more flexible, more advanced, more stable, more user friendly, and more finely tuned in performance. Adobe has been in the imaging industry for a long time, Apple recently started.
Look I love Apple as much as the next man does, but I will be honest this is not a great product for the realm of RAW editing. I have pushed both software applications to their limits and Lightroom has always come out ahead. I showed other photographers how to accomplish what they could not in Aperture.
Sure it's my opinion, but it's not based on pure speculation. It's based on professional experience. Go use your Aperture, love it, worship, praise it and I will do the same for Lightroom. =P