good design?

Out of context: Reply #14

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 32 Responses
  • mikotondria30

    no no no, we all understand the concept of irony, and creating something that is deliberately 'bad', in that it is opposite to the accepted standards of excellence, but the above work IS NOT THAT.
    It's not crap for crap's sake.
    I did not miss the point, 'dog', but the above 'design's are not bad, or undesigned, deliberately, just to be, you know, super-ironic and post-modern, they are just null, not bad, not not-bad, or good. Please understand that we understand you when you say this.
    You have to try a bit harder to be different, than just trying to ignore the rules and falling on your face.

View thread