"law" of evolution?

Out of context: Reply #78

• Started
• Last post
• 90 Responses

• teleos0

  ukit... here's the point you're missing... NS+RM has never, i repeat NEVER been experimentally shown to be the mechanism responsible for such change/adaptation. Conversely, we can hypothesize that pre-existing information was triggered in such speciation events. Why? Look inside the cell (which Darwin couldn't see into). Scientists are finding ancient see urchins with all of the information for digits (fingers) present, just un-expressed. The information was there, just not expressed. Hence the front-loading hypothesis.

  teleos 0Permalink

  UpvoteDownvote

  Flag

  • is there a google version you use that filters out reputable scientific journals and only brings up answersingenesis or other nonsense sites?spifflink
  • nonsense site?spifflink
  • http://www.answersin… :DDrBombay
  • that makes sense!spifflink

  Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note

  SaveCancel

View thread