EARTH.
Out of context: Reply #20
- Started
- Last post
- 20 Responses
- epic_rim0
This was a disappointment. Let me count the ways.
1. 16:9. I saw this in the theater because I thought it might be 2.35:1, but no, just the TV footage upscaled.
2. James Earl Jones may have been appropriate for the narration, but whoever wrote his lines must think it is 1965 and Disney is relevant.
3. This is a frame for frame copy of "Pole To Pole" from the Planet Earth series, except they couldn't leave well enough alone (the original was almost perfect) and some scenes have been sped up or slowed down for "dramatic effect" which is just ridiculous. Along with some other unnecessary edits.
4. The Disney intro, which is stupid.
The whole thing comes across as Disney buying rights to replay the Planet Earth series, but wiping a little shit in the corner and calling it there own. I feel bad for the dudes at the BBC or whatever who put a lot of work into this to watch Disney break it.
</rant>