Brand: Republican Party

Out of context: Reply #17

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 29 Responses
  • gramme0

    I like Pentagram's take. The rest are suck.

    I think we need a viable third party option for people who are pro-life, yet against preemptive strikes; who are pro-environment, yet against big government. As far as I know, there is no such thing, not even close. I think in the post-Bush world, there are a lot of disenchanted Republicans who would spring for such a party. Until then, I despair for our government and electoral system.

    gramme 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • How's about just allowing those others who want to be 'anti-life' be so, and go vote Democrat?Nairn
    • have you heard of Ron Paul?DeSiard
    • I can't in good conscience vote Democrat, as long as that party puts forth pro-choice candidates.gramme
    • < Does Paul really fit this profile? At any rate, I was talking about a viable third party, not someone on the fringe.gramme
    • Call me a one-issue voter, but as much as I want to save the baby seals, baby humans matter much more.gramme
    • *opens can of worms
      *peers inside
      *passes out from the smell      gramme
    • they're called independentsdoesnotexist
    • Are there not viable reasons for pro-choice??? eg. Rape, Extreme Poverty, Disease (mother or baby) Age? I'm pro-life sorta, but wouldn't want to be the product of rape etcAmicus
    • I'm pro-life (sorta) but I wouldn't want to be the product of rape, or have parents that were too old, or addicted etc...Amicus
    • LIBERTARIANsublocked
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread