Politics

Out of context: Reply #4049

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,773 Responses
  • DrBombay0

    All you have to do is look back to the crack smoking 80's under Bush Sr. and then the prosperity of the 90's under Clinton to illustrate that JazX doesn't know beans about what he is talking about.

    • And you think that was entirely Clinton's doing, all the prosperity at that point?
      ********
    • That is not what I said, but to see a complete economic transformation happen in 4 years isn't unrealistic.DrBombay
    • recently http://www.washingto…
      ********
    • Misunderstood what you were saying. Wasn't it Clinton that allowed Freddie and Fannie to give out those mortgages?
      ********
    • So easily that is? People that couldn't afford them.
      ********
    • yeah there werent any lenders giving loans to people who couldnt possibly pay them back...DrBombay
    • not asking for tax forms for the past x amount of years or anything like that.DrBombay
    • not caring if they could pay them off or not, just to get a commission check and then sell the debt down the road.DrBombay
    • you tell me, because the thing collapsed.
      ********
    • tell you what?DrBombay
    • Sorry but the 'prosperity' you speak of was actually a bubble. False prosperity Rick, false. A snowglobe really.tommyo
    • Yeah, times were horrible for everyone when Clinton was President, I know what you mean.DrBombay
    • I'm not talking dotcoms, tommy.DrBombay
    • Neither am I.tommyo
    • See we're in a recession right now and that's what's known as the market trying to adjust itself from a false inflated value.tommyo
    • so times have never been good in my working lifetime at all then...DrBombay
    • We're not talking about times being good or bad. We're talking about the term 'prosperity of the 90's'tommyo

View thread