Politics
Out of context: Reply #3799
- Started
- Last post
- 33,773 Responses
- BRNK0
So JazX, are you implying that we are supposed to take an opinion article based on a book by an established conservative, featuring questionable statistics (as all stats are) with no info on margin of error, sampling size or polling numbers and some magical, sourceless "facts" as the evidence that modern conservatism doesn't equal institutionalized greed? Please. By the way, you are wrong about sates' federal spending versus federal taxes paid having nothing to do with socialism. Socialism is defined as nationalization of public interests while still maintaining some measure of capitalist freedom. Relying on money from the federal government to build roads and police stations with out making an independent, state-level monetary contribution is VERY related.
- Take it as you see it. I read the stuff that you guys post.********
- Yeah I define true socialism much differently. 2 a: a system of society or group living in which there is no********
- no private property b: a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and********
- controlled by the state********
- obama is advocating all production be controlled by the government? That is news to all people who read.DrBombay
- Plus Jaz is WRONG. He is describing Communism. I think instead of reading what we're posting, you should go read up on the political systems you bandy about so you don't come across as such and uneducated person.BRNK
- you should go read up on the political systems you bandy about so you don't come across as such and uneducated person.BRNK
- Take it as you see it. I read the stuff that you guys post.