Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #1613
- Started
- Last post
- 33,770 Responses
- tommyo0
Right and Bush Sr. said no new taxes. That's the trick man ... make promises, then when you get in 'OH MY GOD I did not know what a mess the last guy left, sorry guys.' By the way, the rich are taxed way too much in my opinion. That's a nice little present when you get to the top of the food chain only to find out that the Government is now entitled to 60% of your money and I believe the chart someone posted has Obama taking another 11%. So 71% of your income goes to the country. That's just not fair. If you guys want to view the rich as blood sucking baby eaters than go for it but it's simply not fair.
The Socialism in question for me is the health care. 100% disagree with that and I hope it never gets out of Congress.
- something has to pay for the wars and the bailouts.DrBombay
- Is Japan a socialist nation?DrBombay
- And the federally backed fannie and freddy risky subprime lending the Dems started pushing back in 77.tommyo
- To push our problems today on 8 years of failed policy is silly. Dems have their hands in this almost as much.tommyo
- so what is your point?DrBombay
- That your focus is off if you think this is only a Republican issue.tommyo
- so what is the solution?DrBombay
- Fiscal responsibility. Never been a Dem strong suit but it's also not representative of current Rep strategy either.tommyo