Dress Up Navy Seals As Iranians

Out of context: Reply #3

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 18 Responses
  • dog_opus0

    Hey, dob, the burden of proof is on whoever is making the positive claim (at least if we want to be rational), in this case, Hersh. Unnamed sources doesn't cut it for me, and I would hope that you agree.

    I don't mind if you're tired of me (you can always ignore me if you want to be mature about it), but I have to take exception with this "righties" designation. I vote for Republicans and Democrats; I'm not a partisan, in other words. You are. That's a pity.

    Regarding making statements and never backing "it" up with facts: you should know about that! http://www.qbn.com/topics/560384… (hint: Dennis Miller is like your Dad's racist friend... something along those lines)

    Partisanship on either side of the political aisle is stupid, dishonest, and counterproductive.

    • yes, regarding the burden of proof. Like stating that someone has weapons of mass distruction.Josev
    • "destruction", sorryJosev
    • I'm not quite sure what that has to do with this discussion, but have at it, old boy!dog_opus
    • oh, come on, it doesn't take much to make the connection. Are you that obtuse?Josev
    • We were discussing Sy Hersh, not the Iraq war. Also, insults don't make you right.dog_opus
    • Actually, you were discussing Sy Hersh. The article posted was about allegations that Bush Admin members were trying to lie us into another war, as they did with Iraq Do I need to draw any more lines?Josev
    • trying to lie us into another war, as they did with Iraq Do I need to draw any more lines?Josev
    • Hey dummy, "we" is dob and I. I also find your ideas intriguing and would like to subscribe to your magazine.dog_opus
    • loldog_opus

View thread