Clinton thread
Out of context: Reply #142
- Started
- Last post
- 442 Responses
- mg330
i saw a clip last night of yet another Hillary speech with some witticism like "We need a commander in chief who is more than just speeches..."
But seriously, isn't that all that both of them are doing? I favor Obama tremendously and can't picture Hillary winning the general election at all. But what validity does she have in calling him out over and over and over on giving speeches when they both give very few details at this point about how they would actually accomplish the most pressing issues in this campaign.
It's seriously uncanny how frequently she tries to paint Obama as all talk and no chance of actually accomplishing anything. All her "we need a president who can go beyond speeches and get the work done" is some of the most idiotic rhetoric of the campaign.
As far as I'm concerned, they both have equal chance of stepping in as President and having the opportunity to do what they say they will. The difference is what they want to accomplish. She says just as little as he does in terms of specifics, yet in her warped mind she has all the answers and solutions "just because."
- she attacks the speeches because they represent what he is and she is not--a leader with a soul********
- she attacks the speeches because they represent what he is and she is not--a leader with a soul