not to change the subject, but
not to change the subject, but
Out of context: Reply #42
- Started
- Last post
- 58 Responses
- discipler0
If you begin with Dawkin's extreme Methodological Naturalism, it's easy to see how one arrives at this kind of conclusion. I don't buy it. It's the worst kind of Reductionism. The notion that selfless people who live for the good of others, is a fundamental flaw!? Claptrap.
Some would suggest instead, that it's Christ-likeness. ;)