Intelligent design

Out of context: Reply #66

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 71 Responses
  • Soler0

    discipler, I read your bs "scientific explanation" of ID. Here's the thing:

    Just because there are gaps in scientific knowledge, it doesn't mean that the ONLY explanation is ID. That's FAULTY science. See, scientific conclusions have to have a little thing called PROOF. Noone can prove ID.

    If that scientific model was used in the past- then there would have never been progress. "Hey, what's the chemical makeup of this gas? Dunno, we have no way to find out w/ current technology, must've been God"

View thread