Public Voice Network
- Halp! I need a photograph… 2222
- Pic of the Day 7539675396
- NBA Finals 2013 3232
- Mid-Sr Level Designer NYC 66
- Sci-Fi of the Day 101101
- QBNTPhE 2013 106106
- Font help
- The Million Dollar YouTub… 1717
- the gif animation thread 1880018800
- new MEC logo 2222
- Vid of the Day 1529215292
- a screen printed, black-l…
- ios7 145145
- WANT of the day 14331433
- blog 5785157851
- Retro Dunk Idea 1212
- EC: Storm Thorgerson 1944 – 2… 44
- Scary Cool Tech Thread 317317
- Architecture of the Day 449449
- The Healthy Thread 5050
- Trailer Of The Day 817817
- fight of the day 142142
- Crack Your Back 1313
- FMT140613 1414
New Site... Crit Please! 2727 Responses
Last post: 11 months ago | Thread started: Jul 19, 12, 10:14 a.m.
- prophetone
it's realllly gray, i'd prob nuke the backgrounds altogether, keep it white or a super muted bg at most --- the 'hey dudes' text in the header needs needs some adjusting and spicing up typographically --- what do you mean by 'since 1977'?


- Dog-earJul 19, 12, 10:21 a.m. – Permalink
- OSFA
OK, a quickie...
- I would definitely get rid of the glow.
- There MUST be a better font & COLOR for your "Hello my name.."
- The Nav arrows are huge!
- My browser screen is reduced so right now, your header/logo occupy 50% of my page...
- Have to go...Hope it helps... after all, who the hell am I?


- Dog-earJul 19, 12, 10:25 a.m. – Permalink
- bjladams
Seems visually confusing to have a distressed logo with a glow over a stark digital background.
I'd advise that you get someone to help you with your copy writing.
Visually, the first image in each slider seems odd without consistency - some are cropped, some are full width, some are fading out, some of the backgrounds have a gradient...
Also, a 'contact' section would help - not just a contact form... but info on where you are and how I could reach you-- otherwise you seem like you're lurking in the shadows.
And I don't mean to be rude, but years ago I had a jimdo.com theme that was eerily similar to this layout.
What I do like is that it's simple and straightforward.

- Dog-earJul 19, 12, 10:32 a.m. – Permalink
- monospaced
You spelled "Technical" wrong on your Technical illustrations slide.


- Dog-earJul 19, 12, 11:47 a.m. – Permalink
- flyingnowhere
Some navigation for the slides would be nice for user feedback.

- Dog-earJul 19, 12, 11:52 a.m. – Permalink
- doesnotexist
the bean bags are weird and i don't know if saying using licensed characters is designing.


- Dog-earJul 19, 12, 11:59 a.m. – Permalink
- albums
your sites are all kinda cookie cutter... not much design, all layout, lump all those into "Web design" and get rid of the internet browser chrome. Take all the logos and make them their own entries, you'll benefit from the use of white space around each of them instead of all grouped together. reorder the list to technical illustrations, individual logos, then web design. also, use pngs or check the compression on your jpgs, something went wonky when you sized them down, looking kinda rough.

- Dog-earJul 19, 12, 12:07 p.m. – Permalink
- hellobotto
Please scrap the "since/established 1977" unless you have been developing concepts and securing contracts for the last 35 years. This "I've been creative since I was born" trend needs to stop.
Where's the Punches For thread?

- Dog-earJul 19, 12, 1:23 p.m. – Permalink
- Complexfruit
— I really like your technical illustrations, I think those are your strongest work.
— Give more padding in between each portfolio piece, right now it feels too cramped.
— On some of your images there are two rules on the top (a dark gray, and a lighter gray), think about eliminating both as they might not be necessary.

- Dog-earJul 19, 12, 8:47 p.m. – Permalink
- e-pill
your engineered mechanical illustrations are the strongest part of the site. i feel it dominates the rest of your work as it looks more professional. they are very clear and visually amazing
you should do more industrial design illustrations. or add more to your portfolio.

- Dog-earJul 19, 12, 9:04 p.m. – Permalink


