Public Voice Network
- San Francisco 2727
- London machete attack 4242
- Pic of the Day 7475374753
- Outdoorsmanship 4545
- religion 219219
- Chick of the day .Gif 5454
- Amy's Baking Company 114114
- International Web Dev 22
- iPhoto 55
- the gif animation thread 1847118471
- Show your latest Pics 39363936
- Game of the Day 1111
- Designer Drugs 224224
- New BOC 2929
- Vid of the Day 1506915069
- Trailer Of The Day 798798
- DUBSTEP of the Day 459459
- Been asked to do a legal … 99
- Flat Design 161161
- blog 5770757707
- 2013 QBN Mugs 9292
- Decriminalize all drugs 1111
- GIF vs JIF 5454
- good music with fake inst… 55
pretentious art 7777 Responses
Last post: 1 year ago | Thread started: Nov 29, 11, 4:23 p.m.
- loool
is today's art overrated and pretentious?
In time when visual arts are everywhere and we are bombed with rich visual content everywhere we go, I am still "doing the effort" and go to the gallery (because I think it is ok to the artist who made the exhibition) and all I see is a bunch of artists who make some kind of arrogant and egoistic work giving nothing back to me as a visitor...
I don't really expect anything genius, or revolutionary in return, but I don't really see the point in going to the gallery only to see two lines in the 100 cubic meters...and after that I am feeling like an idiot...artists are not putting effort at all...or I don't get this...
- Nov 29, 11, 4:23 p.m. – Permalink
- idiots
I think the only reason we think more so now is because of the increase in artists, available mediums, and gallery spaces.
we were raised on fine art and sculpture, oil, and metal, this was the norm until we grew into ourselves realizing our likes and dislikes which caused us to realize that "art" is much more broad a term than how we were raised.
i try to find the effort in something and appreciate that.
I saw a piece hanging at the museum of natural history I think in SF, it was thousands of thin strips of tape, taped to itself in a circle with the adhesive out so they would all stick together. it hung from 15 feet in the air about 20 feet wide 2 feet from the wall. All i could do was stare at it wondering why? how? and who?
now as a piece of art in my home? no. a piece of art that will last, no. but the effort and pure logistics behind the piece made it a stand out installation in my eyes, as it was 6 years ago and the only piece i remember from the visit.
art, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.


- Dog-earNov 29, 11, 4:34 p.m. – Permalink
- waterhouse
There are alternatives to "stuntmen." There are artists who still can move man and child alike. Whose art can change someone's life forever.
Mine was when, at 16, I first saw a Richard Serra sculpture. (Of course, one doesn't just "see" a Richard Serra work.)

- Dog-earNov 29, 11, 6:08 p.m. – Permalink
- Miguex
I am still "doing the effort" and go to the gallery (because I think it is ok to the artist who made the exhibition) and all I see is a bunch of artists who make some kind of arrogant and egoistic work giving nothing back to me as a visitor...
Some artists will speak to you, some won't. Nothing wrong with that, is just like music, I cringe when I hear MGMT on the radio, but some people love it. Same works for visual art.
If you really want to go deep:
You are saying: " all I see is a bunch of artists who make some kind of arrogant and egoistic work giving nothing back to me as a visitor..."
Perhaps that's the message, arrogance and egocentrism, (blame myspace/ facebook for that) the lack of message could be THE MESSAGE, now ...The important thing is to keep an open mind, maybe research about the show before going too, but consider all this work that you don't like, a way to make the piece that you like more valuable, if you liked everything that was out there, then none of it would stand out to you, everything would be at the same level, rendering everything meaningless (sprinkle that on the pipe too)


- Dog-earNov 29, 11, 6:22 p.m. – Permalink
- pr2
Words like "pretentious" + anything else are often used by people who wished they could comprehend but they simply have no mental ability to do so, so to save their own ego from crumbling in their own view of how smart the see themselves they start talking about "pretentious (something)."


- Dog-earNov 29, 11, 7:26 p.m. – Permalink
- ukit2
100 years ago to become an artist you were expected to master traditional drawing and painting and study for years. Now it is all, for the most part, conceptual and even if there is technical skill involved, the barrier to entry is much lower. Anyone can participate, and naturally because of that you get some good stuff and also a lot of crap.


- Dog-earNov 29, 11, 7:37 p.m. – Permalink
- loool
I am just trying to understand some of these things...the problem with me personally is that I see artists who have grants and funds and studios and publicity and shit and at the end I go to the exhibition and go home disappointed...
And the problem is definitely in me...I am not accusing anyone as ignorant, just starting to have my doubts...and I am trying very hard to avoid prejudice. When I see hardworking artist's exhibition, that is like an eyecandy to me, even if the work itself is not too interesting to me I still appreciate the effort...
But there are also the Mr. Brainwash type of artists...and that: I don't like...I know that I am a primitive rigid bastard, but that's just the way it is...


- Dog-earNov 30, 11, 2:34 a.m. – Permalink
- Projectile
Oh come on
art is worth every penny, always!!
Just fucking look at this fucking master and her fucking masterpiece!!


- Dog-earNov 30, 11, 3:33 a.m. – Permalink






