Hollow Earth theory
- Started
- Last post
- 43 Responses
- Horp0
I'm going to try and read the rest now.
- Horp0
Okay, so the next line...
"In light from today's technology, many of our findings point towards a hollow structure as the only method to explain many of today's scientific findings."
This needs to be clarified. Something like...
"In light from today's technology, many of our findings point towards a hollow structure as the only method to explain many of today's scientific findings. By 'our findings' I am of course referring to the elite collective of retards who masturbate on turds and who gather in my dorm room whenever nurse lets us all be in one place, so we can develop our ridiculous crackpot theories".
- Horp0
First off, this line...
"While the first concepts were crude, this 'crazy' idea has slowly developed into a viable alternative to the solid Earth model"
No. That's not true. If you want us to believe this stuff, you're going to have to be honest and accurate. Something like this...
"While the first concepts were crude, this 'crazy' idea has slowly developed into a crazy and crude concept"
- differenz
The Hollow Earth Theory has been around for a long time. While the first concepts were crude, this 'crazy' idea has slowly developed into a viable alternative to the solid Earth model. In light from today's technology, many of our findings point towards a hollow structure as the only method to explain many of today's scientific findings.
If indeed entities exist beneath the surface of the planet, they would not live in molten rock but in space ships. And as the tectonic plates are breaking - it is either by their doing, a knowing that the consciousness hologram that creates this reality, is ending so they no longer have to monitor from below, or they emerge as the plates naturally break apart.
According to the Hollow Earth Hypothesis, planet Earth is either wholly hollow or otherwise contains a substantial interior space. The hypothesis has long been contradicted by overwhelming observational evidence, as well as by the modern understanding of planet formation; the scientific community has dismissed the notion since at least the late 18th century.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wiki…
There exists two openings at the North and South Pole, each hole having a circumference of 1400 miles wide. At the center of the earth is not a molten core but an inner sun which is six hundred miles wide and is 2900 miles from the Inner Surfaces. The diameter of the lip at the opening at the poles is 1200 miles long, thus a person can not see the other side of the opening.
Therefore, there exists three worlds on our planet, the outer surface, where we live, the middle earth which purportedly is lined with many caverns, tunnels (made by someone), Inner Cities and people who live there and lastly the Inner Surface. How Gravity works then is the following. For the people who live on the outer surface, Gravity holds them down. For the people that live in the middle earth, the closer they get to the center of the crust (i.e. - 400 miles down), the less effect gravity will have upon them.
Opinions?