Politics
- Started
- Last post
- 33,469 Responses
- yurimon0
Actually he is Bi-sexual and the mother of one of 3 deceased lovers who conveniently died 1 month of each other mysteriously and conveniently. One of the guys mother came out trying to tell her story in honor of her son. This happened not sure before or after the election. That's how this story got traction. Been a while so you can try to search for the source if you really want, but pretty much authentic. She had a picture of Obama and the one of the gay guys sitting on a couch together little to close. Not sure if that photo or the site see put up is still around.
Rule #1 if your gay and is a lover of someone to be president, RUN!
- oy veylocustsloth
- "but pretty much authentic" as in you actually believe it?aaux
- but ti was on the DL so its ok since he is black.teh
- How well do we know our presidents and leaders?yurimon
- How well do you know the batshit crazy people spewing this garbage?aaux
- TheBlueOne0
I posted this in the Romney thread, but I think it deserves to be here, so pardon the dbl post.
"There was along period of history where wealth was concentrated in the equivalent of the 1%. It in fact did not "trickle down", but led to odd funnel like economies where luxurious trivialities were trade goods, and the general run of humanity were essentially indentured servants at best, slaves at worst. It curtailed economic innovations for centuries, derailed technological development, locked up the free flow of information and put humanity's cultural development into deep stasis.
How a modern political party can make a legitimate argument that further concentration of wealth and perpetual protection thereof will somehow benefit all is something I find odd - especially so from one in a nation who fought to overthrow the chains of such things. Twice. The only way that the argument sticks is by massively funding incessant and widespread cultural propaganda that supports such a view as true and unquestionable - which has been an ongoing operation now for about a hundred years btw."
- TheBlueOne0
Top Ten differences between White Terrorists and Others
1. White terrorists are called “gunmen.” What does that even mean? A person with a gun? Wouldn’t that be, like, everyone in the US? Other terrorists are called, like, “terrorists.”
2. White terrorists are “troubled loners.” Other terrorists are always suspected of being part of a global plot, even when they are obviously troubled loners.
3. Doing a study on the danger of white terrorists at the Department of Homeland Security will get you sidelined by angry white Congressmen. Doing studies on other kinds of terrorists is a guaranteed promotion.
4. The family of a white terrorist is interviewed, weeping as they wonder where he went wrong. The families of other terrorists are almost never interviewed.
5. White terrorists are part of a “fringe.” Other terrorists are apparently mainstream.
6. White terrorists are random events, like tornadoes. Other terrorists are long-running conspiracies.
7. White terrorists are never called “white.” But other terrorists are given ethnic affiliations.
8. Nobody thinks white terrorists are typical of white people. But other terrorists are considered paragons of their societies.
9. White terrorists are alcoholics, addicts or mentally ill. Other terrorists are apparently clean-living and perfectly sane.
10. There is nothing you can do about white terrorists. Gun control won’t stop them. No policy you could make, no government program, could possibly have an impact on them. But hundreds of billions of dollars must be spent on police and on the Department of Defense, and on TSA, which must virtually strip search 60 million people a year, to deal with other terrorists.
- teh0
- Ramanisky20
Megadeth frontman Dave Mustaine said this to an audience in Singapore ...
"Back in my country, my president... he's trying to pass a gun ban, so he's staging all of these murders, like the Fast and Furious thing down at the border... Aurora, Colorado, all the people that were killed there ... and now the beautiful people at the Sikh temple... I don't know where I'm gonna live if America keeps going the way it's going because it looks like it's turning into Nazi America."
- Jail time should be mandatory for being that stupid.mg33
- dave is the new joe the plumber.teh
- This makes his old songs about satanic rites, russian roulette and undead witches sound sane by comparisonlocustsloth
- time to get into my time machine and throw away that one Megadeath CD I bought in '87.fooler
- i feel bad for Ellefson, who has to put up with this crap for a living nowlocustsloth
- http://www.youtube.c…pablo28
- Its called MKultra. there was a senate hearing 1963 and 1977 on mind control CIA clones...yurimon
- OH jesus, enough with the conspiracy theoriesaaux
- Its a fact check the congressional record. Stop your ignorance.yurimon
- deathboy0
- unless you're richRamanisky2
- ha yea these guys http://news.yahoo.co…deathboy
- locustsloth0
Honestly, this is a little disappointing.
http://thehill.com/homenews/camp…
i don't think (and never have) that Biden brings much to the ticket. It's almost as if he fills the old white guy requirement. i was pulling for Richardson as VP.
Not that Hillary would have provided more than an additional target for the old white guys on the other side of the aisle to attack.
- ukit20
Evidence that the U.S. wants to charge him
-On December 2, 2010, two influential U.S. Senators, Democrat Dianne Feinstein and Republican Christopher Bond wrote to Attorney General Eric Holder to declare "Mr Assange's conduct is espionage . . . we urge that he be prosecuted under the Espionage Act".
-A few days later, Feinstein, head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, took out a column in the Wall Street Journal to make the same case ("Prosecute Assange Under the Espionage Act").
-On December 19, Vice President Biden called Assange a "terrorist" and suggested that his case was fundamentally different from that of a journalist receiving leaked information. "If he conspired to get these classified documents with a member of the US military that is fundamentally different than if someone drops on your lap."
-In January, 2011, the New York Times reported that the Justice Department had gone to Court to force Twitter to provide details of the account activity of several Wikileaks members, including Assange. The Times called it "the first public evidence of a criminal investigation."
-In April, 2011, U.S. news site Salon.com reported that they had obtained a copy of a subpoena issued by a Grand Jury in Alexandria, Virgina. According to the article, "the Subpoena explicitly indicates that the Grand Jury is investigating possible violations of the Espionage Act (18 U.S.C. 793)."
- Sorry wrong threadukit2
- Ironically no one congress is being prosecuted for treason in helping our country head downwardyurimon
- Yes, I'd start with the House Republicans.TheBlueOne
- teh0
- teh0
- ukit20
Republican Congressman Todd Akin, currently the GOP nominee running for Senate against incumbent Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill, justified his absolute opposition to abortion (no exceptions for rape) by claiming that the victims of “legitimate rape” have biological mechanisms in place to reject and prevent pregnancy.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/g…
This guy is on the Science Committee in Congress..