Politics

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,469 Responses
  • omg-11


    • lol, that's you burning it huh, complaining that it's being taken away even when it isn't, isn't it?monospaced
    • I think the bottom sign said "FREE SPEERS!" obvi the guy spelled spears wrong and was forced to destroy his sign along with his fashion sensekona
    • "People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." Kierkegaard describing omg.garbage
    • Free speed, hence the crowd of revved up youngsters. Undercover narc breaking things up with fire.Fax_Benson
    • i think this is just some really meta shit. see, he's flipping the burning sign the bird, indicating that he opposes the opposition of free speech.sarahfailin
    • feelings firstGnash
    • ouch?monospaced
    • oopsGnash
  • Ramanisky25

    No vote on healthcare bill today ...
    What an amazing deal maker.

  • fadein113

    • Clerkenwell?Khurram
    • Bishopsgate - City of London.fadein11
    • "As in previous research
      the results show that significant minorities within both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland support the use of violence...
      Khurram
    • ...for political ends. There is perhaps no other advanced industrial society where such large numbers of people effectively condone terrorism."Khurram
    • https://www.abdn.ac.…Khurram
    • Tiocfaidh ár lá!!!!Khurram
    • thanks for the info - having lived with an Irish catholic for 5 years of my life I am aware of the complexity of the troubles. Read the caption again.fadein11
    • If you had 10 chocolate bars and one of them was.... - lol sorry, i'm just obfuscatingKhurram
    • tbh, i'm sick of the round-the-clock news coverage yesterday's event is getting in the media hereKhurram
    • Just as many people were massacred in a gun rampage in the US yesterday http://www.economyle…Khurram
    • In case you didn't know :)Khurram
    • indeed - the media coverage has been sickening.fadein11
    • they didn't ban them. but they did fight them
      https://en.wikipedia…
      Gnash
    • oh dude - you have totally missed the point. We shit on the Irish - everyone knows that. The point was we didn't make pointless gestures of banning themfadein11
    • gnash - please don't feel the need to educate me on the Irish troubles - really.fadein11
    • Considering Northern Ireland wanted their Independence, they could have preferred that UK ban Irish people in return of their land.omg
    • lol omg - you dimwit - half of Northern Ireland din't - that was the problem - jog on now simple boy.fadein11
    • your little graphic would suggest otherwiseGnash
    • It's a simple statement gnash if you are struggling with it I am sorry. The IRA destroyed a big chunk of The City of London. As they did Manchester.fadein11
    • But at no point in the 90's did the British people push for a ban of Irish people from the UK. Nor did they assume that all were terrorists.fadein11
    • We went to war against Ireland??? When the fuck did that happen??!! Was it in the 90s when I was at those raves???Khurram
    • 60's onwards Khurram. I give up.
      I think I may retire from QBN politics (hears QBN cheer in background). Nite guys.
      fadein11
    • We never went to war against Ireland.Khurram
    • Well, apart from Henry VIII, Oliver Cromwell, William of Orange....Khurram
    • I would say Bloody Sunday was total war. But no we didn't declare war against NI nope, that would have been a bit silly.fadein11
    • Oh yeah!? Well I've seen "In the Name of the Father", so let me know if you have any questions on the matter.HijoDMaite
    • don't go fadein! Who's gonna help me and mono come up with different ways to tell omg that he's a complete fucking imbecile??BuddhaHat
    • I was 5 miles away when that went off and the apt shook. We thought it was an earthquake.Dillinger
    • anyhoo, its not the same. We are now seeing a holy war, and its not going to stop.
      Not after the coalition forces destabled the mid east region
      Dillinger
    • For once we agree dillinger to a degree (the NI troubles became all about holy issues)fadein11
  • fadein111
    • the guy is essentially illiterate. We know he can read, right? he does use a teleprompter, I think.Gnash
  • chukkaphob3

    • you know that came straight from the dealer and lysoled down™BonSeff
    • later he paid some whores to piss in it™moldero
    • Wonder if he has auto insurance?R_Kercz
    • Just like a child who loves trucks and can't wait to grow up to get a license and drive one. He's even pulling fake dual truck horns.monospaced
    • Being from NYC I bet he doesn't even have a license.monospaced
    • Lol at dual truck horns pmslfadein11
    • https://www.youtube.…kona
    • Hmm...insensitive? #doesntthinkdoesntca...see_thru
  • utopian1

    Thousands of Trump University students file to get their money back

    More than 3,700 of them have filed claims as part of last year's $25 million settlement agreed to by President Donald Trump, according to Rachel Jensen, a plaintiff's attorney representing some of the students. About 7,000 former students were eligible to submit claims, but the deadline to file was March 6.

    http://money.cnn.com/2017/03/23/…

  • ok_not_ok9

  • IRNlun6-3

    A blasphemy law has now been passed in Canada. Western Nations are suffering from a serious cultural crisis.

    Canada passes M-103 "To stop Islamophobia and all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination"

    http://news.nationalpost.com/new…

    • Does this mean that pop culture / media will stop shitting all over judaism and xtianity at every turn or is this just a pc islamic thing?PonyBoy
    • Would be interesting to see if it's applied evenly, which would make this even more concerning.IRNlun6
    • laws to tell us what we can and can not say.... Who votes these buffoons into power??inteliboy
    • Fortunately, it's not a Bill or a Law. It's a non-binding motion.Gnash
    • https://media.giphy.…moldero
    • How's this blasphemy???
      I'm Canadian and i'm totally in favor of this law. Woot woot.
      pango
    • the gov't could draft legislation at a later time, but for now m103 will make no change to the criminal codeGnash
    • Well it's not exactly a law to be accurate. but more of acknowledgement that the govnt will condemn Islamophobia.pango
    • most objections to this motion has been around the use of the word, IslamophobiaGnash
    • Don't go cry your pants off just yet. it's not going to effect your freedom of speech.pango
    • not sure it's really about freedom of speech as much as it is balance in 'phobia'. Jews / Xtians (especially Xtians) are a constant target of jokes / ridicule..PonyBoy
    • ... in western pop culture (for proof see the 'religion' thread)... whereas islam is treated like a minority or an endangered species.PonyBoy
    • last stats Canada data had 3x hate-motivated crimes targeting the Jewish religion vs MuslimGnash
    • which they are... there has been way more attack towards them than them attacking others.pango
    • Take a scroll through Religion thread and notice which religions can be liberally ridiculed.IRNlun6
    • Xtians hasn't really been attacked. And in Canadian history, Xtians+Govt has been the main source of systematic oppression toward minority.pango
    • our criminal code already addresses all forms of religious discrimination and systemic racism.Gnash
    • And it took free, open, and difficult communication to change that. Catholicism didn't change on its own accord.IRNlun6
    • towards practically every minority who's not white. Indian, american indian, chinese, japanese, and now Muslim.pango
    • One good point in the article is Muslims deserve protection, not Islam.IRNlun6
    • ugggghhhh this is getting really confusing with the way notes are...pango
    • lol, i know!Gnash
    • "religious people deserve legal protection, but religions do not"Gnash
    • "cultural crisis" ??
      this is nothing. try... taken away from home by govt+Xtians when you were a child, stripped away your own language and identity.
      pango
    • Yes, cultural crisis where illiberal laws are passed to appease a religion.IRNlun6
    • you read what i wrote right? "taken away from home by govt+Xtians when you were a child, stripped away your own language and identity.“pango
    • this is not a law. but a motion. because the recent raise of attack towards Muslim.pango
    • And what laws support that? Do you think Islam is free from having committed atrocities?IRNlun6
    • and it's not exactly forced down the throat. 3 out of 5 parties voted for it. 201 vs 91. 2/3.pango
    • what laws support what?pango
    • in canada? no. why?pango
    • Canada just recently criminalized incorrect use of gender pronouns. It's not a leap to think this bill will be expanded.IRNlun6
    • uggghhh i'll come back later and see what's up. You're crying over something that doesn't effect you even if you are Canadian.pango
    • We did? where you get that info?pango
    • (bill C-16, pango)Gnash
    • (not using someone’s preferred pronouns be considered discrimination under the new human rights legislation, it would be a form of hate speech)Gnash
    • oh that. most of the provinces and territories already include gender identity and gender expression in their provincial Human Rights Codes.pango
    • feds are just saying "ughhh i guess it's a thing now"pango
    • (*could, not would)Gnash
    • and you know what? no one will ever be criminalized by mistaken or misuse a person's gender pronoun.pango
    • if you haven't noticed, I tend to argue about many thing that don't effect me.IRNlun6
    • unless they intentionally refuse to use what the said person prefers.pango
    • ^ yes, that can be construed as a hate crimeGnash
    • we digress...Gnash
    • ya. same here. but why you trying to stop(oppose) other people getting what they want?pango
    • the whole pronoun thing annoys me too but it make other people's life better and doesn't effect me.pango
    • I get you, it's an asshole move, but should you go to jail for it? personally, I don't think so.Gnash
    • it's unjust laws and legal consequences that annoy me. society can't work through its problems if it has legal minefields regarding speech.IRNlun6
    • that part, i agree.pango
    • that's very true, IRN. It's only though free discourse the society addresses it's issuesGnash
    • well M-103 is still not a law. and id like to see the day somebody actually gets charge because bill C-16. Just so we know what would actually happen with it.pango
    • because i'm not major in law and i don't think any of you are as well.pango
    • I imagine what will mostly happen with C16 is it will inform HR policies, and result in job loss if you refuse to use pronounsGnash
    • This is why I'll stick to my translation of the quote you posted. :) Free speech/press can be ugly, lies, and conspiracy. But critical to a free society.IRNlun6
    • RE: M103, I think we should be free to criticize any religion or doctrine without fear of prosecution.Gnash
    • there’s a big difference between discriminating against Muslims and criticizing Islamic doctrineGnash
    • the word, Islamophobia, conflates the twoGnash
    • i seriously doubt there will be prosecution criticize Islam. however if you go to a mosque and scream camel jockey. you deserve it.pango
    • lol, yup. natural consequencesGnash
    • Take this situation for example:
      http://www.cbc.ca/ne…
      Gnash
    • ^ We should obviously be able to speak out against this without being thought of as racist or islamophobicGnash
    • Again. seriously doubt anyone criticizing Imam's statement will be prosecuted.pango
    • but should we moan about an athlete wearing a hijab? http://din.az/wp-con…Gnash
    • ugghhh someone should get charged because of M103 already. that way we truly know what would happen.pango
    • ... I don't think so. But the area in the middle gets grey and who decides where the line is.Gnash
    • even thought it's not a law...
      Has anyone of us read the detail of M103? cuz i haven't.
      pango
    • again, we already have laws that addresses all forms of religious discrimination and systemic racismGnash
    • maybe that's why it's not a law but a motion. to acknowledge raise of attacks on Muslim in Canada.pango
    • uggh *and to condemn the increased attack on Muslim community.pango
    • Ya, I don't think it's that big a deal, actually. It's only a motion.Gnash
    • I think it would have been almost a unanimous vote if they changed the word, Islamophobia, to 'Anti-Muslim Bigotry'Gnash
    • mehhh perhaps.
      and there will always be people be like "blasphemy!" "serious cultural crisis!"
      pango
    • IRN - you really do whine a lot don't you.fadein11
    • All religion can and should be ridiculed publicly without consequence because it's all stupid.monospaced
    • oh please, I'm not nearly as emotionally invested in these conversations as you think...IRNlun6
    • and yes it's a crisis since so many left/progressives are obsessed with fetishizing anything foreign or ethnic that it throw away...IRNlun6
    • ... it's own principles on equality.IRNlun6
    • Shitty comment fadein. Every man should critically analyse new laws, especially when they potentially plans the way to curbing free speech.set
    • It's a sad day when analysing and discussing new laws is labeled as whining..set
    • ... And to tell him he whines a lot after you're all constantly shitting tears over trumpset
    • Bit rich.set
    • Don't you dare criticize group X. Group X can only be seen in a positive light, and not as a full human being with character flaws and all.IRNlun6
    • This isn't about simply stereotyping or criticizing, it's about stopping hate crimes no? pretty sure it's still okay to criticize without discrimination or hatemonospaced
    • Imagine being viewed as a terrorist just because of your religion. That must be shifty.monospaced
    • Anyway. "Khalid’s motion changes no existing laws nor does it create any new laws." it's simply not a threat to free speech.monospaced
    • Stop whining. Bigger fish to fuckin fryfadein11
    • @set he's a whiney little right wing bitch and i will say what i fucking like (free speech ya)fadein11
    • And what mono said. Preventing hate crime is not anattack on free speech. Its not even a law ffs. Move on and tackle the real issues. Sideshow nonsensefadein11
    • It's called discussion. Are you suggesting people should only ever talk about the biggest issues on the planet? That's retardedset
    • IRN. If you think this is cultural crisis. You don't know what cultural crisis is. And quite frankly, You are whining.pango
    • Everyone. I feel like we are arguing about different thing here.pango
    • This motion is not a law. Even if it is, you are not going to be prosecuted for crtisizing Islam.pango
    • This is to make it extra clear the Canadian govt condemn bigotry toward people who practices Islam.pango
    • This is the reaction towards the recent raise of white supremacist influence. and people being attacked and killed simply cuz theyre being associate to Islam.pango
    • This is not going to take away any of your current right (Canadians). This reinforces the current law meant to prevent hate crime.pango
    • exactlymonospaced
    • exactlyfadein11
    • @set - lol, come on now - you are much brighter than that.fadein11
    • you claim to be"far left" yet see a bill fighting hate crime as an attack of free speech. you are like a QBN chameleon - no consistency.fadein11
    • Set far left? Not even. I don't even see my self as far left but I know I'm further left than set.pango
    • We'll see now won't we. It's been working great in Europe so far according to fadein11.IRNlun6
    • Shocking how a 2nd generation British Muslim is responsible for the latest terror attack. How could this have been possible?IRNlun6
    • They have an M-103?pango
    • A lone wolf nutjob influenced by the endless stream of fear broadcast on MSM. This has nothing to do with Islam.fadein11
    • @pango - he said it himselffadein11
    • IRN - frame it how you like though - if it fits your right agenda of course ;)fadein11
    • IRN - eat has been working great in Europe? Please don't talk about problems in Europe when you have a mass shooting in your country every week (at least)fadein11
    • committed by your own citizens... seriously - take a look at your own problems before you start wetting your panties over occasional tragedies in Europe.fadein11
    • eat = what*fadein11
    • What's been working great in Europe? 2nd generation British Muslim? He's a jamaican convert. Born Adrian Elms. Check yo'self and reformulate your thesis kthxbaiKhurram
    • IRN doesn't research anything Khurram - he just gets triggered when he hears the word Muslim.fadein11
    • He's not worth the effort - he's engulfed in fake news barely keeping his head above the water.fadein11
    • He's aight. There's more obstinate nativist/tribalist types on here. :)
      Peace & Love!
      Khurram
    • yep - me. I will be gone soon.fadein11
    • Khalid Masood, born as Adrian Russell Elms; 2nd generation British citizen, born in Dartford Kent. You mistake my interest in this subject fadein.IRNlun6
    • 2nd generation British citizen? He wasn't born a Muslim is the point. He converted late in life. What are you on about?fadein11
    • But aside from this he was a lone wolf copycat nutter - no different to all the nutjob Amercian citizens who go on rampages in US every week.fadein11
    • uh dude, you were clearly implying he was born a muslim to immigrant muslim parents lolKhurram
    • He attacked parliament with a knife - such sleeper cell sophistication and funding? But carry on making a tragedy fit your hate filled agenda.fadein11
    • I have friends that I very much care for who are muslim. I do make an effort to learn as much about history and current events on this subject as possible.IRNlun6
    • fair enough - don't get your knickers in a twist over bills being put in place to protect your friends then. Look whatever. I will be gone soon.fadein11
    • fade! take it down a notch! I'm enjoying your posts but IRNlun6 is not hate filled. These are difficult times, we must allow the moderate right to have a voice.Khurram
    • and don't be gone! keep speaking :)Khurram
    • Yep - I got triggered by the right complaining about a minor bill put in place to protect people. But you are right..fadein11
    • Sorry IRN for getting annoyed but I strongly dislike the sentiment.fadein11
    • I enjoy the conversation. No harm meant.IRNlun6
    • I appreciate that Khurram.IRNlun6
    • sure. a conversation or whatever. it's still a stupid statement calling this a Western Nations' serious cultural crisis.pango
    • when this western nation(canada) has a history of stripping other people's cultural away.pango
    • many people suffered and life's were lost during that process.pango
    • now there's a motion. not even a law. to condemn bigotry. and you call it a cultural crisis. pfffffffffpango
    • also it's hard to forget you posted a video made by a fascist group showing them provoking muslin neighborhood.pango
    • and call it a proof of no go zone. you are not gonna get a pass for posting bs like this and that.pango
    • people will call it out.
      well the least internet people will do anyway.
      pango
    • 'I'll be gone soon' lol it's Yurimon.set
    • I posted what video? What are you talking about?IRNlun6
    • This motion wasn't just a simple gesture that didn't receive considerable debate.IRNlun6
    • Blasphemy laws exist in the EU, and a problem it creates is that it immediately frames the conversation in a negative light.IRNlun6
    • let's just say sure they exist. (i'm not gonna look through every laws in EU). how is a motion to prevent bigotry towards islam, Blasphemy??pango
    • Government shouldn't be passing these motions for penance to their pasts.IRNlun6
    • and quite frankly i don't trust your judgment on what is Blasphemy.pango
    • don't trust me. what's bigotry towards an ideology?IRNlun6
    • look, I'm not dismissing communities having to live in fear.IRNlun6
    • Yes. This motion is to condemn bigotry. Not to shield from criticism.pango
    • when people are being killed for their believe. you don't think government should step in?pango
    • "western nation cultural crisis" what culture are you losing? if you live in canada.pango
    • the culture of being able to cause suffering to minority and get away with?pango
    • please type your comments as fast as you can. so i don't cut it off.... i'll try to do the same.... =__=pango
    • get away with it? I'm not Canadian but I'm certain people aren't allowed to get away with attacking people of any belief.IRNlun6
    • The term Islamophobia has a much larger global context. Especially in today's world with war, refugees, and terror.IRNlun6
    • yes. i know you don't live in canada. that's why i said "if you live in canada" multiple times.pango
    • An issue that's put considerable pressure mainly in the Middle East and a Europe.IRNlun6
    • it is none binding. it is not a law. it is a motion. it doesn't condemn criticism towards islam. It condemns attack n bigotry towards people who practice islampango
    • It's very tough to talk about this in here. Jordan Peterson is a Professor at Toronto U that is much more articulate on this...IRNlun6
    • your culture and free speech is completely intact. Even if you're canadian. which you're not.pango
    • The whole idea of this imaginary "western civilisation" is so fucking purile and ridiculous. Like they have a monopoly on any of the values they call "Western"Khurram
    • basically "white' civilization in another guise.Khurram
    • ok one question. what culture are you losing? let's pretend you are Canadian.pango
    • I heard Muslims hate hockey...
      ... thus it's virtually the end of Canada.
      So long, 'murica JR!
      <3
      PonyBoy
    • No, I don't mean White. The US, Canada, Europe... been multicultural societies for decades, for better or for worse.IRNlun6
    • and what culture aspect are you losing?pango
    • One could argue they may be 'multicultural' in citizenry, IRN... but even I have to admit the leadership of said Nations has been primarily pasty in skintone.PonyBoy
    • I was incorrect to call this a law.IRNlun6
    • free speech, a value we all very much share in the west. that's not saying other cultures wouldn't share that value.IRNlun6
    • You will still be free to criticize islam even if this motion is law.pango
    • perhaps hyperbolic but I see it as our crisis, and I see several speech related issues popping up on campuses or in our politics.IRNlun6
    • I also mean West in terms of relative historical context and not some racial purity nonsense.IRNlun6
    • ya i also see most people who protest this motion were from far right. or S.O.O https://en.wikipedia…pango
    • we can all try to make connection however we want. but one thing certain about this motion.pango
    • we can all try to make connection however we want. but one thing certain about this motion.pango
    • you can still make criticism toward Islam. i'm repeating it because i want to make it very clear.pango
    • I understand pango.IRNlun6
    • And yes I'm not surprised far right groups would be against this just as jihadis would be for it. Extremists.IRNlun6
    • Yes. We're not them! We're not them.
      https://youtu.be/-F-…
      pango
    • IRN, get a grip, there's no threat to free speech here or in the United States. All that school stuff you're triggered about isn't law, it's just a classroom.monospaced
    • Also, this isn't an extremist thing. It's about telling bigoted assholes to stop being cunts to peaceful muslims just because of their religion and origin.monospaced
  • monospaced0

    So you don’t feel like Comey’s testimony in any way takes away from the credibility of the tweets you put out, even with the quotes?

    "No, I have, look. I have articles saying it happened. But you have to take a look at what they, they just went out at a news conference. Devin Nunes had a news conference. I mean I don’t know, I was unable to see it, because I am at meetings, but they just had a news conference talking about surveillance. Now again, it is in quotes. That means surveillance and various other things. And the New York Times had a front-page story, which they actually reduced, they took it, they took it the word wiretapping out of the title, but its first story in the front page of the paper was wiretapping. And a lot of information has just been learned, and a lot of information may be learned over the next coming period of time. We will see what happens. Look. I predicted a lot of things that took a little of bit of time. Here, headline, for the front page of the New York Times, “Wiretapped data used in inquiry of Trump aides.” That’s a headline. Now they then dropped that headline, I never saw this until this morning. They then dropped that headline, and they used another headline without the word wiretap, but they did mean wiretap. Wiretapped data used in inquiry. Then changed after that, they probably didn’t like it. And they changed the title. They took the wiretap word out."

  • Gnash2

    President Trump warned House Republicans on Thursday that he will leave ObamaCare in place unless they approve legislation to repeal and replace it.

    http://thehill.com/policy/health…

    • this can be good, no?Gnash
    • Reps had years to craft a law and can't get it passed when they control the Senate, the House and the Presidency. Best thing would be for this to fail.IRNlun6
  • monospaced0

    But even in that Sweden quote, you said look at what happened on Friday in Sweden. But you are now saying you were referring to something that happened the following day.

    "No I am saying I was right. I am talking about Sweden. I’m talking about what Sweden has done to themselves is very sad, that is what I am talking about. That is what I am talking about. You can phrase it any way you want. A day later they had a horrible, horrible riot in Sweden and you saw what happened. I talked about Brussels. I was on the front page of the New York Times for my quote. I said Brussels is not what it used to be, very sad what has happened to Brussels. I was absolutely lambasted. A short time later they had the major attack in Brussels. One year ago today. Exactly one year ago today. And then people said you know Trump was right. What am I going to tell you? I tend to be right. I’m an instinctual person, I happen to be a person that knows how life works. I said I was going to win the election, I won the election, in fact I was number one the entire route, in the primaries, from the day I announced, I was number one. And the New York Times and CNN and all of them, they did these polls, which were extremely bad and they turned out to be totally wrong, and my polls showed I was going to win. We thought we were going to win the night of the election."

    • He also mentioned there was a death during the ruckus. When there wasn't, even remotely. People here think he's a fucking chucklehead.face_melter
    • He's a fucking embarrassmentfadein11
  • monospaced0

    ... it strikes me there is still an issue of credibility. If the intelligence community came out and said, we have determined that so and so is the leaker here, but you are saying to me now, that you don’t believe the intelligence community when they say your tweet was wrong.

    "I’m not saying—no, I’m not blaming. First of all, I put Mike Pompeo in. I put Senator Dan Coats in. These are great people. I think they are great people and they are going to, I have a lot of confidence in them. So hopefully things will straighten out. But I inherited a mess, I inherited a mess in so many ways. I inherited a mess in the Middle East, and a mess with North Korea, I inherited a mess with jobs, despite the statistics, you know, my statistics are even better, but they are not the real statistics because you have millions of people that can’t get a job, ok. And I inherited a mess on trade. I mean we have many, you can go up and down the ladder. But that’s the story. Hey look, in the mean time, I guess, I can’t be doing so badly, because I’m president, and you’re not. You know. Say hello to everybody OK?"

  • mugwart2

    Sadly no aliens/ reptilians / Satanists in this video. Really do agree with his point of view on this:

    • David Icke talks a lot of sense, sometimes. But then he says the Moon is a holographic transmitter broadcasting our reality to Planet Earth lol.fadein11
    • when heads get stuck down rabbitholes ;)fadein11
    • well thats his final 'belief' system. might be far out for most but we are all entitled to a model of belief. Most his grounds make sense though.mugwart
    • I grew up in a very upper class too-do-family. Bunch of narcissistic cunts. For someone normal looking in I get them comparing the elites to shape shifters!!mugwart
    • puts bums on seats that's for sure - he's v.wealthy now.fadein11
  • Gnash0

  • bulletfactory1

    I love trucks.

  • Maaku3


  • dbloc1

    Mexicans were asked what they thought of Trump's proposed wall. They replied, "We are very upset .....but we'll get over it."

    • ba-dum-tssssarahfailin
    • Can't blame them for leaving. From the Mexican miracle to oligarchs and narcos bilking it's resources, driving millions of it's citizens out of the country.IRNlun6
    • lol IRN, WUT?monospaced
    • confused?IRNlun6
    • Perhaps the focus shouldn't be on the mean Americans that allowed millions to work, live and thrive. Rather the shit Mexican leaders that helped drive this.IRNlun6
    • dude take a breath and read it againdigitdaily
    • I did, I get it. I ranted. I'll stop now.IRNlun6
    • uhhhh ... they'll "get over it" dudemonospaced
    • at least we have that in common IRN :)fadein11
    • yeah, yeah, my mistake mono. went overboard on the first post, then you triggered me.IRNlun6
    • ha, yeah I can tell fadein...IRNlun6
  • utopian1

    Report suggests FBI has travel, business, and phone records that could tie Trump's campaign to Russia

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/re…

    • #GoTeamRussia!utopian
    • "Is it too late to pardon myself?" Barry ObamaDillinger
    • lol, except Trump didn't reference this, he goes back only to a Times article he insists said it, which is a lie of coursemonospaced
  • utopian1

    Donald Trump Jr slammed for criticising Sadiq Khan only hours after London attack

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/youre…

    • #GoTeamRussia!utopian
    • London's mayor attacks people living in big cities (no problem) Jr. attacks mayor and Wes Streeting's feelings get hurt. Oops!omg
    • he didn't attack anyone you fool omg.fadein11
    • London mayor used terror attacks to attack "big city living" by normalizing terror as part of life. What a fucking joke!omg
    • Here we go again...see_thru
    • I give up with that tool. Sad!fadein11
    • no he didn't, omgmonospaced
    • Sadiq Khan goes on saying how bridges bring people together to prevent terrorism, yet it was the Westminster Bridge that helped this terrorist attack.omg
    • ^i lole'dKhurram
  • utopian2

    Keystone XL pipeline would only create 35 permanent jobs

    President Trump hailed the State Department's approval of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline as a big win for American workers.

    Fucking Republitards!

    http://money.cnn.com/2017/03/24/…

    • #GoTeamRussia!utopian
    • Let me tell you..laying pipes...very complicated...nobody knew...we have tremendous pipes by the way, the best pipes....see_thru
    • lol see_thrufadein11