Politics
- Started
- Last post
- 33,468 Responses
- Ramanisky26
Haha ... That Alex Jones part is amazing
- deathboy1
I think every poll should have attached its polling methods and links for raw data. Be fun to see how many loadouts you can get by tweaking the methods.
- they domonospaced
- really? i've never seen it.deathboy
- that's because you're probably not reading the polls, you're reading an article that is interpreting themmonospaced
- every poll is required to provide methods, raw data and polling parameters, like number of respondents, etcmonospaced
- For example, here's one:
https://www.scribd.c…monospaced - ah thx. wow polls have such a small sample size. i wonder how they do there locations or if there is a way to bot game it through survey monkeydeathboy
- just a silly rule you have to poll X amount to be in a debate. there should be no rules to hinder any network from having whoever they want on the debatedeathboy
- This poll example had a sample of 15,000 voters. Demographics reflect the nation for the most part. Margin of error is transparent and it's tracked over time.monospaced
- Read the "methodology" section where they explain it's opt-in and the whole thing is subject to so many errors it's really hard to say if it's accurate or not.monospaced
- yea i was looking at it and the jargon tosses me a bit. not sure if that is the point. i find statistics interesting because they can be so deceptive in summarydeathboy
- ill probably look into it more when i have more time. was thinking how important these polls seem to be and yet i know nothing about themdeathboy
- RealDonaldTrump4
- lmfao does this guy even understand the values this country was built on? it was created by immigrants ya fat orange shit!CygnusZero4
- lol, dude. He's seriously troll level 100. Absolutely fucking with us.sofakingback
- Cant be real.sofakingback
- obviously it was sarcastic ... maybe not that sarcastic ... but it was I'd say 75% sarcasticmonospaced
- hey guys, i wanted to let you know that you're all losing your jobs today. we found some immigrants who'll work much cheaper. luckily you're all supportive.KaitlinMcCarthy
- I was thinking about that, I wonder what percentage of jobs immigrants take. Illegal jobs (under the counter) would be tough to tell, they have an idea.sofakingback
- Are we also counting immigrants with visas? That would be legal jobs... anyway, i would love to see how many jobs are "being lost"sofakingback
- Truth is, no one cares about those jobs. Fat americans can't even work at McDonalds let alone a field or manual labor.sofakingback
- The reality is Americans are exploiting illegal immigration for cheap labor. Which makes perfect sense, of course they would. Its America, fuck yea.sofakingback
- The good news is immigrants will be getting paid $15/hr at McDonald's soon. and the Millennial generation can go straight to unemployment.KaitlinMcCarthy
- They're already drowning in their student debt, so we're going to have to rely on the immigrants to bring the economy up.KaitlinMcCarthy
- This has got to be fake right??yuekit
- If this isn't real, this one is:
https://twitter.com/…monospaced - oh... no, my link is NOT real... apologies, that was a parody accountmonospaced
- This one is also fake.monospaced
- The thing is migrant workers from Mexico are not getting hired at McDonalds. They are mostly doing specialized agricultural work that they are good at.yuekit
- Certain states tried to crack down on illegals, and their agricultural industry tanked. So the idea that these people are leeching off society and stealing jobsyuekit
- isn't really true, but makes a convenient scapegoat for economic problems.yuekit
- ^ Yup, all true. 1: Like you said, without that labor we would be paying much more for items at the store. 2: Americans can't and won't do those jobs.sofakingback
- 3: Those jobs don't even come close to affecting unemployed Americans on the take or is it an impact big enough to dent the economysofakingback
- But its so, so, much easier to say: mexicans are the reason we have a shit ton of unemployed, uneducated americas. Think about all of the countries main issues,sofakingback
- No one wants to face reality and address the real problem, instead its easier to find blame. Whatever, though no one cares about that. lets chase our tailsofakingback
- KaitlinMcCarthy-2
- I Thank you for your support of my candidacy!RealDonaldTrump
- lol @ the wallnb
- omg-7
- nb1
Hm, typically I wouldn't pay much attention to anything Micahel Moore has to say, I really don't care about his opinion....
Moore is claiming that Trump is sabotaging his own campaign. Sound ridiculous, I know. But the first paragraph of this article implies (with a wink and a nudge) that Moore knows about this because he shares some team members with Trump. He's claiming he has insider details.
I've never bought the theory that Trump was a secretly a plant by the Clintons, because that's a stupid theory. But this is an interesting one. Might not be true, still worth the read.
- Micheal More is big fat fail and a total looser!RealDonaldTrump
- Let's not forget: spending zero on TV ads, "self-financing" which is actually just loaning his campaign money, plus it would explain his odd behaviour.nb
- because Democrats wouldn't know anything about rigging or setting up elections to favor a particular person.omg
- #LoserTrumpRamanisky2
- I think bromanisky is jealous of a trump. you are what you hate sometimes. prob be the same prick with that moneys$$$yurimon
- @omg Do you know what the role of the DNC is? They aren't there to enforce fairness, their job is to ensure a Dem in the whitehouse, and Dems in congress, etc.nb
- They're not some non-partisan org. When this election started, Hillary was the easy favorite to win President, no matter who she was running against.nb
- The DNC's mission is NOT to make sure that all the candidates get an equal chance at winning the nomination. Their goal is the general election.nb
- I'm not saying I agree with it (I don't) and members should be pissed about what happened, but honestly what they did is totally par for the course.nb
- lol, hillary is favorite cause top 1% cash. nothing wrong with it. if you guys want corruption and say one thing do the opposite. than great.yurimon
- lol, so nb was all for bernie. once he got screwed. fuckem. corruption i like it. bewildered to fact that we been under 1990's GWB policies since OByurimon
- can't tell cause of bias labeling mechanisms. couple of policies to make it look like democratic party. it voyks,yurimon
- yuri please. nb didn't say anything about supporting Hillary or voting because he likes corruptionmonospaced
- I was for Bernie before he started campaigning. I didn't care for his nearly "one-issue" campaign. Banking reform is an issue, but it's not going to fix it all.nb
- Hillary was expected to win this election before she had even announced. She was loved, good name recognition, global experience.nb
- BTW, I'm not a Democrat, never will be. I think political parties should be made illegal. Candidates should run on their own merit and policy.nb
- @nb The DNC is not only supposed to do their job, but standby their values and core beliefs.omg
- #loseryUrineRamanisky2
- Every single person in history who has held their thumb on the scale were considered cheaters, con-artists, thieves, etc.... they were all doing their job.omg
- ...but they weren't because people were promised an honest fair share, where everyone plays by the same rules towards success.omg
- people didn't get that therefore the DNC was not doing their job.omg
- So that's why you vote trump and republican?monospaced
- I'm undecided. Looking at my options.omg
- First of all, not everyone "holding their thumb on the scale" were all "doing their job". That's a ridiculous statement.nb
- Is a waiter doing his job if he spits in your soup before serving it to you? Isn't that what the DNC did?omg
- Second, "People were promised a fair share"? "Where everyone plays by the same rules"? Have you ever even been to America?nb
- you can argue that he did his job, but at whose cost?omg
- Look, I'm not saying the DNC is a good organization. They suck, and the GOP sucks. They hurt democracy. But it's not new to this election.nb
- The waiter analogy is ridiculous. Try another.nb
- how about a chef?omg
- it's an Iron Chef battle, and we're all the judges. Chef #1 cooks a delicious soup. Chef #2 also cooks a delicious soup.omg
- Chef #1 wins.... congratulations. We the judges go home, and a note under the door reads. "The folks at Food Network spat in the soup you just ate and judged"omg
- Meanwhile Chef#2 knowing the soup has been spit into and asking you to please have some more as both chefs have joined forces.omg
- So I'm wondering why are you still considering in eating the same soup?omg
- Again with the soup? That analogy is terrible.nb
- If what Michael Moore says is the real deal, then this could those beautiful master stroke of epic trolling ever conceived.Continuity
- 'Could be the most beautiful' ... fuck you, iPhone auto-correct.Continuity
- I think it's more likely that Trump didn't want to be president, but now that he has a chance, he definitely wants to be president.nb
- Ramanisky24
Trump tonight in Wisconsin.
"I will be seeking a 'peaceful regime change' in America."Spoken like a true brown starfish
- nb4
Today in the L.A. Times:
I was a Minuteman III nuclear launch officer. Take it from me: We can't let Trump become President (Op-Ed)
Since the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima in 1945, American presidents have thought of their nuclear responsibilities as the heaviest burden one could shoulder.
Harry Truman wrote, “We have discovered the most terrible bomb in the history of the world.” Dwight Eisenhower, no stranger to conflict, said that nuclear bombs have made war “not just tragic, but preposterous.” John F. Kennedy called the weapons a “sword of Damocles,” one all Americans were forced to live beneath.
Those men bring us to 2016 and the Republican candidate for president, Donald Trump, who also had some deep thoughts on nuclear weapons. That is, “if we have them, why can’t we use them?”
The very point of nuclear weapons is that they are never used. We have them to dissuade hostile powers from attacking us, and vice versa.
Deterrence, as this policy is known, has been the backbone of U.S. national security for decades. That a candidate for the highest office in the land needs this explained to him, not once but thrice, should give every voter pause.
Full article:
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/o…- yepfadein11
- Trump warned viewers of the dangerous possibility of “having some maniac, having some madman go out and get a nuclear weapon,” and said “that's in my opinion,nb
- that is the single biggest problem that our country faces right now.”
I couldn’t agree more.nb - Meanwhile Obama plans $1 Trillion Nuclear Arms Upgradeomg
- very reluctantly, over 30 years, and in direct response to Russiamonospaced
- yuekit3
Trump just appointed the CEO of Breitbart to run his campaign.
http://www.businessinsider.com/s…
Also known for directing this movie:
- omg7
- LOL dumb fucking rednecksmoldero
- those ads .. oh man :DRamanisky2
- Yuri Focus Group®utopian
- no need to bring yuri into this, you're above thatmonospaced
- nb3
- are those porn stills??Ramanisky2
- tons of dick picssarahfailin
- #nofiltermoldero
- So #meta moldyRamanisky2
- THOSE ARE DIC PICKS? Oh Jesus I just sent this to my nana because she's 90 and senile and loves Trump... OH MY GOD what have I done to nana......kona
- haha @molderonb
- #dickpicTrumpRamanisky2
- moldero1
Green Party town hall is on CNN in 10 minutes