Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #20305
- Started
- Last post
- 33,469 Responses
- deathboy1
I think every poll should have attached its polling methods and links for raw data. Be fun to see how many loadouts you can get by tweaking the methods.
- they domonospaced
- really? i've never seen it.deathboy
- that's because you're probably not reading the polls, you're reading an article that is interpreting themmonospaced
- every poll is required to provide methods, raw data and polling parameters, like number of respondents, etcmonospaced
- For example, here's one:
https://www.scribd.c…monospaced - ah thx. wow polls have such a small sample size. i wonder how they do there locations or if there is a way to bot game it through survey monkeydeathboy
- just a silly rule you have to poll X amount to be in a debate. there should be no rules to hinder any network from having whoever they want on the debatedeathboy
- This poll example had a sample of 15,000 voters. Demographics reflect the nation for the most part. Margin of error is transparent and it's tracked over time.monospaced
- Read the "methodology" section where they explain it's opt-in and the whole thing is subject to so many errors it's really hard to say if it's accurate or not.monospaced
- yea i was looking at it and the jargon tosses me a bit. not sure if that is the point. i find statistics interesting because they can be so deceptive in summarydeathboy
- ill probably look into it more when i have more time. was thinking how important these polls seem to be and yet i know nothing about themdeathboy