Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #20309
- Started
- Last post
- 33,469 Responses
- nb1
Hm, typically I wouldn't pay much attention to anything Micahel Moore has to say, I really don't care about his opinion....
Moore is claiming that Trump is sabotaging his own campaign. Sound ridiculous, I know. But the first paragraph of this article implies (with a wink and a nudge) that Moore knows about this because he shares some team members with Trump. He's claiming he has insider details.
I've never bought the theory that Trump was a secretly a plant by the Clintons, because that's a stupid theory. But this is an interesting one. Might not be true, still worth the read.
- Micheal More is big fat fail and a total looser!RealDonaldTrump
- Let's not forget: spending zero on TV ads, "self-financing" which is actually just loaning his campaign money, plus it would explain his odd behaviour.nb
- because Democrats wouldn't know anything about rigging or setting up elections to favor a particular person.omg
- #LoserTrumpRamanisky2
- I think bromanisky is jealous of a trump. you are what you hate sometimes. prob be the same prick with that moneys$$$yurimon
- @omg Do you know what the role of the DNC is? They aren't there to enforce fairness, their job is to ensure a Dem in the whitehouse, and Dems in congress, etc.nb
- They're not some non-partisan org. When this election started, Hillary was the easy favorite to win President, no matter who she was running against.nb
- The DNC's mission is NOT to make sure that all the candidates get an equal chance at winning the nomination. Their goal is the general election.nb
- I'm not saying I agree with it (I don't) and members should be pissed about what happened, but honestly what they did is totally par for the course.nb
- lol, hillary is favorite cause top 1% cash. nothing wrong with it. if you guys want corruption and say one thing do the opposite. than great.yurimon
- lol, so nb was all for bernie. once he got screwed. fuckem. corruption i like it. bewildered to fact that we been under 1990's GWB policies since OByurimon
- can't tell cause of bias labeling mechanisms. couple of policies to make it look like democratic party. it voyks,yurimon
- yuri please. nb didn't say anything about supporting Hillary or voting because he likes corruptionmonospaced
- I was for Bernie before he started campaigning. I didn't care for his nearly "one-issue" campaign. Banking reform is an issue, but it's not going to fix it all.nb
- Hillary was expected to win this election before she had even announced. She was loved, good name recognition, global experience.nb
- BTW, I'm not a Democrat, never will be. I think political parties should be made illegal. Candidates should run on their own merit and policy.nb
- @nb The DNC is not only supposed to do their job, but standby their values and core beliefs.omg
- #loseryUrineRamanisky2
- Every single person in history who has held their thumb on the scale were considered cheaters, con-artists, thieves, etc.... they were all doing their job.omg
- ...but they weren't because people were promised an honest fair share, where everyone plays by the same rules towards success.omg
- people didn't get that therefore the DNC was not doing their job.omg
- So that's why you vote trump and republican?monospaced
- I'm undecided. Looking at my options.omg
- First of all, not everyone "holding their thumb on the scale" were all "doing their job". That's a ridiculous statement.nb
- Is a waiter doing his job if he spits in your soup before serving it to you? Isn't that what the DNC did?omg
- Second, "People were promised a fair share"? "Where everyone plays by the same rules"? Have you ever even been to America?nb
- you can argue that he did his job, but at whose cost?omg
- Look, I'm not saying the DNC is a good organization. They suck, and the GOP sucks. They hurt democracy. But it's not new to this election.nb
- The waiter analogy is ridiculous. Try another.nb
- how about a chef?omg
- it's an Iron Chef battle, and we're all the judges. Chef #1 cooks a delicious soup. Chef #2 also cooks a delicious soup.omg
- Chef #1 wins.... congratulations. We the judges go home, and a note under the door reads. "The folks at Food Network spat in the soup you just ate and judged"omg
- Meanwhile Chef#2 knowing the soup has been spit into and asking you to please have some more as both chefs have joined forces.omg
- So I'm wondering why are you still considering in eating the same soup?omg
- Again with the soup? That analogy is terrible.nb
- If what Michael Moore says is the real deal, then this could those beautiful master stroke of epic trolling ever conceived.Continuity
- 'Could be the most beautiful' ... fuck you, iPhone auto-correct.Continuity
- I think it's more likely that Trump didn't want to be president, but now that he has a chance, he definitely wants to be president.nb