Democratic Debate 116116 Responses

Last post: 5 years, 7 months ago | Thread started: Sep 26, 07, 8:05 p.m.

Respond New Topic Disable Images

1 2 3 4 5 61 to 20 of 116

ethered
...troops out in 2013? Spying without a warrant is ok now? Iran beef heating up?...and Clinton seems to be playing Bush's "skirt the issue" type dialogue...
hmmm....
Sep 26, 07, 8:05 p.m. – Permalink
bliznutty
yeah fuck a democrat. you call that left?
DNC in Denver '08. I hope i'm still around here then for the Black Tea Party!!
mark my words:
hillary is so guaranteed the presidency that they will rig the election if needed.
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 26, 07, 8:10 p.m. – Permalink
bliznutty
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bla…
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 26, 07, 8:13 p.m. – Permalink
bliznutty
sorry to hog the thread.
but it should be noted that Republicans and Democrats were the same party from 1792-1912.
If the two parties don't seem that different its because they aren't.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dem…
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 26, 07, 8:28 p.m. – Permalink
bliznutty
sorry to hog the thread.
but it should be noted that Republicans and Democrats were the same party from 1792-1912.
If the two parties don't seem that different its because they aren't.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
bliznutty
(Sep 26 07, 20:28)
.. actually thats false sorry.
LOL
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 26, 07, 8:37 p.m. – Permalink
lvl_13
sorry to hog the thread.
but it should be noted that Republicans and Democrats were the same party from 1792-1912.
If the two parties don't seem that different its because they aren't.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
bliznutty
(Sep 26 07, 20:28)
and what are you doing different?
i say that in jest of course :)
but, seriously. when the fuck will anything change? there really are some scary people with some very scary ideals out there...
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 26, 07, 8:37 p.m. – Permalink
e-pill
sorry to hog the thread.
but it should be noted that Republicans and Democrats were the same party from 1792-1912.
If the two parties don't seem that different its because they aren't.
en.wikipedia.org/wik i/...
bliznutty
(Sep 26 07, 20:28)
three times a charm?
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 26, 07, 8:39 p.m. – Permalink
tommyo
You guys thought that they were going to pull the troops out as soon as they took office?
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 26, 07, 8:42 p.m. – Permalink
bliznutty
that was false. i read it wrong. there were 2 different republican parties. the current one today started in 1850s. anyway the clintons are a front. bill clinton became what he was for helping the republican party launder money through the state he governed after the Iran contra scandal. HIllary has been protected by secret service since then. its destiny she will win in 08. Iran?
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 26, 07, 8:47 p.m. – Permalink
ethered
bump
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 27, 07, 7:08 a.m. – Permalink
Jaline
hah, Hillary is unflappable...
I have no idea who I would vote for if I lived in the U.S.
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 27, 07, 7:14 a.m. – Permalink
ethered
Jaline are you in Canada?
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 27, 07, 7:15 a.m. – Permalink
ethered
oh yeah i just saw your profile. I forgot about the profiles.
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 27, 07, 7:22 a.m. – Permalink
planet01
Hillary's "I would never vote for her" numbers are BAD.
She might win the Nomination, but I think she is just too polarizing.
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 27, 07, 7:34 a.m. – Permalink
mg33
Now even Bush says that Hillary will win the nomination.
Ahhh....
The Republicanization of Woman.
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 27, 07, 7:35 a.m. – Permalink
mrdobolina
That debate was upsetting.
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 27, 07, 7:36 a.m. – Permalink
ethered
"That debate was upsetting."
why?
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 27, 07, 7:42 a.m. – Permalink
mrdobolina
can't guarantee out of iraq by 2013 because everyone knows they aren't giving up the bases or the embassy.
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 27, 07, 7:48 a.m. – Permalink
BonSeff
kicinich was the only one that manned up on that topic
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 27, 07, 7:49 a.m. – Permalink
mrdobolina
too bad noone will vote for him because they can't imagine drinking beer with him.
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 27, 07, 7:50 a.m. – Permalink
tommyo
She might win the Nomination, but I think she is just too polarizing.
planet01
(Sep 27 07, 07:34)
Exactly why I hope she doesn't win. It'll be the exact same thing as it is with Bush in terms of the Democrat-Republican divide. So far I don't see any other candidate being this polarizing.
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earSep 27, 07, 7:56 a.m. – Permalink

1 2 3 4 5 61 to 20 of 116

Login or Register to respond to this

Public Voice Network

Democratic Debate 116116 Responses

Login or Register to respond to this