Darwinist
- Started
- Last post
- 592 Responses
- JazX0
the christian bible says that the earth is only a bit over 6,000 years old.
All scientists agree that the earth is older than that.
What gives?
mrdobolina
(Jan 5 06, 08:12)that definitely isn't something I believe in, it's older than 6K but I don't think they are on target with the Earth being 4.55 billion years (plus or minus about 1%)
- discipler0
That's cute, designerror. Nonsense, but cute.
- JazX0
KuzIII, as I predicted. I'm a regular Kelpernicus!!
:O
- TheTick0
Discipler, it's not science to suggest that biological origins aren't natural. It's really simple.
Mimio
(Jan 6 06, 07:42)
---------------------
Well it's about as scientific as those guys who carry around volt meters in "haunted houses" to detect spiritual energy. All very scientific you see...they have meters.
- cosmo0
the christian bible says that the earth is only a bit over 6,000 years old.
All scientists agree that the earth is older than that.
What gives?
mrdobolina
(Jan 5 06, 08:12)does the bible mention dinosaurs? I could be wrong but as far as I know it doesn't.
That means dino bones have been planted by human beings for fun. :)
- mrdobolina0
apologetics: The branch of theology that is concerned with defending or proving the truth of Christian doctrines?
- flagellum0
The Tick speaks of enlightment, but refuses to look at where the last 30 years of scientific discovery has been pointing. I call this sticking one's head in the sand. He is stuck in a caricature of history and what he thinks science is. He opts for what makes him feel comfortable rather than what the evidence shows. I couldn't sleep at night if I took this approach to life.
- JazX0
if christ would read this...
pascii
(Jan 4 06, 09:06)he would smack us all
- -sputnik-0
kOna, may i recommend a "dance-off"?
- Mimio0
lol.designerror
- PonyBoy0
Enter response:
... while you're linking jazX... you think you could hurry it up on getting me our next white house world christian domination meeting schedule?
- flagellum0
Nonsense, mimio. Science should not be restricted to Methodological Naturalism. It's that simple.
And even if we do restrict it, ID still observes what it observes. Additionally, it's not science to suggest that molecules to man evolution occured.
- Mimio0
Whoah, Kuz got clipped.(again)
- discipler0
Mimio, you still conflate ID with Creationism. So, it's not even possible to discuss the issue with you. Your starting point is wrong.
- mrdobolina0
what is the significance of 'slinky'
I dont get it.
- flagellum0
well jazX, people are more concerned about their egos and what makes them "feel" intellectual, rather than following the evidence even if it makes them feel uncomfortable or challenges something they've held on to for so long.
- paraselene0
if christ would read this...
pascii
(Jan 4 06, 09:06)he would smack us all
JazX
(Jan 4 06, 09:08)it's SMOTE! smote, ferchrissake! hasn't chossy taught y'all nothing?
- JazX0
yeah, I'm not sure of your point Tick, but yes, you cannot use Carbon-14 dating for anything older than 50K years within current evolutionary scientific thinking. Constituent minerals (chemical compounds (elements)) will not allow it.
yep
- JazX0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apo…
Apologetics is the field of study concerned with the systematic defense of a position
hahha ;)
ohh man you guys crack me up