Darwinist
- Started
- Last post
- 592 Responses
- petrol0
gonna (eventually) set up a font site with a few free-uns tho
- JazX0
ehh.. k can't do that one but I here you...
- petrol0
hmmm actual money works for me :)
- JazX0
would you consider making a trade for some of those lovely fonties?
*pants like a dog
- petrol0
why thank you!
havn't updated it in ages tho
- JazX0
nice portfolio you have there petrol!
- petrol0
We don't know .No one knows. Religion gives reason to some.
- pavlovs_dog0
science has far, far more answers than any religion.
and yes, the truth hurts.
last
fucking
word.
- JazX0
Im not a scientist, so I can't really say what is right or wrong as far as the flagellum and all that.
mrdobolina
(Jan 6 06, 13:42)nor should you have to be to have an opinion. even if you were some scientists of a specific discipline, it doesn't meant you have all the answers. Way too many variables and for us to sit here and act as if we have all the answers on any level is absolutely ridiculous.
- pavlovs_dog0
last word?
- Mimio0
discipler? Ya got yer ears on? [over]
- pavlovs_dog0
i guess all i have left to say is...
i win.
- xenicon0
go ape, heheh
- pavlovs_dog0
"your homeboys are outnumbered"
...like 10,000 to 1.
...and the 1's got xtain supremancy on the brain.
- Mimio0
For the record, Discipler, do you agree with Behe? or do you believe species to species evolution is impossible? Doesn't Behe basically beleive in natural selection?
- mrdobolina0
Im not a scientist, so I can't really say what is right or wrong as far as the flagellum and all that.
but majority rules, sad to say your homeboys are outnumbered for the time being.
The dangerous precedent that this would set in this country would be bonkers, too. Pat Robertson and all the nutjob evangelicals would go ape.
- pavlovs_dog0
teleology? who cares about final causes? We discuss first causes.
Entropy is OK for newtonian physics but are we really running out of "useful energy" I thought the point was transformation of energy. At least since 1905.
Finally, any system that destroys itself as a condition of its existence is OK for art see Godot. Even parasites manage to keep hosts alive long enough to propogate.
xenicon
(Jan 6 06, 13:39)xenicon is on another level.
- pavlovs_dog0
i so love to see discipler debate xtian supremacy with a fundameltalist shite...
islam being a much stronger faith based on the fact it remains ideologically consistent with the torah...
none of that hippy dippy jesus loves b.s. to contradict the fire and brimstone god of the old testament.
- xenicon0
teleology? who cares about final causes? We discuss first causes.
Entropy is OK for newtonian physics but are we really running out of "useful energy" I thought the point was transformation of energy. At least since 1905.
Finally, any system that destroys itself as a condition of its existence is OK for art see Godot. Even parasites manage to keep hosts alive long enough to propogate.
- flagellum0
Im just kidding btw, you can believe all you want.
Just keep it out the public schools.
mrdobolina
(Jan 6 06, 13:34)-----------
If it's science, it should be in public schools. Narritives which contradict the evidence, should not. ;) C'mon, mrdobs, by now you should have learned not to conflate the science with it's implications.