Intelligent design
- Started
- Last post
- 690 Responses
- mrdobolina0
stop saying the word "posited" all the time, it sounds very pretentious.
- mrdobolina0
I will ask you one more time, discipler, does ID have anything to do with God?
- gruntt0
y'all should start a thread every monday just called "ooooYEAH?!" and then the folks that always end up in the ID threads can debate any dang thing y'all want to.
love y'all. mean it.
- ukit0
Yeah, I think it does diminish your credibility. And Garrett - think you need to calm down a little bit there lol.
- discipler0
ah, and this is the point where mimio shifts gears under pressure and resorts to petty vitriol. ;)
- pavlovs_dog0
you are boring and stuipid
- pavlovs_dog0
and i awlways like to remind the xtians... your lossing the religion war on other fronts as well.
- KuzII0
Kuzz, you are definitely venturing into unfamiliar territory here. Books are most definitely peer reviewed and in many cases held in higher regard than published papers.
discipler
(Nov 9 05, 07:02)that's not true discipler! Behe's book Darwin's black box never went through the peer-review process! It was released for the layman! Yet Disco claims it WAS peer-reviewed!
- discipler0
no.
- discipler0
ummm... baskerville, ever heard of the Big Bang? See, science has already proven that the universe is not eternal (Steady State idea).
- Mimio0
I think it's kind of pointless to argue science with someone who believes the Earth and everything on it is less than seven thousand years old.
- garettwest0
Well then if you believe Jesus Christ walked the earth why so much talk about Intelligent design and why are you so against dicipler?
It doesn't make sense and now you're just backtracking.
- ukit0
Of course there are debates about specific events in history. Such as the evolution of dinoasurs to birds which you mentioned. The world is 5 billion years old, so of course we don't have a complete record of everything. That isn't the same thing as saying there is serious doubt about the fact that evolution is the mechanism by which life has developed. There simply isn't doubt about that.
A bunch of pseudoscientists funded by religious extremists doesn't equal doubt within the scientific community.
- pavlovs_dog0
you are boring and stupid.
- discipler0
true that, garrett.
I agree to disagree, kuzz.
- kelpie0
hahahahahaha I love this thread.
*stabs burning hot needles in his balls
- KuzII0
haha, that's even funnier! that it's set in the future.
It's like "i know everyone thinks we're crackpots now, but you wait - in 2025 they will hail us as kings!"
lol
And Jonathan Wells is a Theologian, it says in google that he attended the Unification Theological Seminary.
More infor on the Unification Theological Seminary:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uni…
sounds like a Christian to me!
- discipler0
you are delightful and vivacious
pavlovs_dog
(Nov 9 05, 10:24)
- deep_throat0
should we turn a blind eye to scientific discoveries because of their philosophical implications?
discipler
(Oct 7 05, 08:25)lol
yeah, "scietific discoveries"