site crit... aaand go
- Started
- Last post
- 35 Responses
- Xopher0
Sorry, but this to me is like the next generation of bad web design.
Endless gimmicks for the sake of it while not delivering any real content.
- animatedgif0
Feels like a server hosting website
give me http://art.yale.edu any day over this
- trooperbill0
not designed with the fold in mind... i take it the boss has a retina mac. might be worth showing them it on a standard laptop.
- JamesBoynton0
Oh boy. KISS.
- ernexbcn0
The innovative, accessible, at your fingertips and collaborative section when you change between them the content flickers on Safari.
- ESKEMA0
the animations are all very well done, but it's trying too much...
- inteliboy0
Obnoxious would be the correct word here.
- webazoot0
Interesting but as in conveying information or me having the patience to try to read/navigate it lost me.
- d_rek0
Running kind of clunky in Chrome on my iMac.
- HAYZ1LLLA0
Very Nice. Slick site!
I got confused on the "Catch You on the Flipped Side" slide. Too short. I thought the next slide was part of it or missing copy.
A few too many navigation methods to the same thing.
Could do with some student or learning images or a building shot? Needs something photographic! Otherwise looks like a hosting company as others say.
From a usability (mong) side I kept clicking previous but it did nothing. realise now i had to click the one at the top.
Well done for posting. I wouldn't have the balls ;-)
- lowimpakt0
when I saw logo I assumed it was an MiT sub-site
- dbloc0
overkill on the navigation....makes it confusing.
- twokids0
terrible. terrible. you could fill pages with why it is terrible.
- ********0
While the interaction is way over the top, I don't think it's by any means "terrible." But, I guess haters are going to hate.
I really liked some of the sub-sections of the site, but I do agree that overall it's a poor UI/UX design, and that the content strategy is severely lacking. If they are looking to confuse people, they won.
- twokids0
" While the interaction is way over the top, I don't think it's by any means "terrible." But, I guess haters are going to hate.
I really liked some of the sub-sections of the site,
but here is the good part
"but I do agree that overall it's a poor UI/UX design, and that the content strategy is severely lacking. If they are looking to confuse people, they won."
Sounds terrible to me! They wanted feedback, we gave it. That is not hating.