Shell Oil - Social Media Experts
- Started
- Last post
- 54 Responses
- 74LEO0
Its amazing the number of adverts posted were against shell... and still our governments persist on giving our tax dollars to them.
the funny thing is how many people protested the site, big oil/shell. maybe big oil and all governments will listen to what"the people" want.
- fat chance.... big oil, corporate america and the us government all the same.utopian
- albums0
in one day, one company that we consider "big oil" earns as much $$, if not more than, all the people who posted the adverts. that fact is why the current state of things stays the way they are.
- pizzafire0
sign here: http://www.savethearctic.org/
- mekk0
i was always wondering why oil companies need to do marketing for private customers.
If red lamp in your car is on > refill.
its that simple.Just impossible to turn a brand in this field to not being hated by everyone..
- sine0
Shell wants to frack in my backyard...
http://www.fin24.com/Companies/I…
- animatedgif0
Really what were the agency thinking who came up with this idea?
- Bluejam0
Actually articready.com is the work of Greenpeace and has nothing to do with Shell.
- detritus0
I thought this was some made up campaign, no?
'arcticready.com' doesn't whois to shell in any way, but some privacy protecting service, which lends credence to this.
Anyone got any insight here?
- Bluejam0
more info about the Shell/Greenpeace stuff...
http://www.newstatesman.com/blog…
(i don't share the views reflected in the above article)
- interesting. missed the first few spoofs but i look out for oil news.shellie
- shellie0
It could be a spoof. If it is, hats off to the spoofer.
- pizzafire0
and then there's this:
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel…
"Five top multinational oil companies have been targeted by members of Anonymous, who published about 1,000 email addresses for accounts belonging to the firms, as well as hashed and unencrypted passwords.
...
The hackers used some of the stolen credentials to add signatures to Greenpeace’s “Save the Arctic” petition."
- mantrakid0
Im with Nathan Adams on this.. the fact that so many people were fooled into thinking this was legit says a lot about how it was presented... they wanted people to think it was real.. not a parody. Thats some defamation shit.
That being said, i have no fucking sympathy for an oil company wanting to be treated like a human being. Fuck em.
- shellie0
a lot of work went into this one. I wonder how much exactly the anti-campaign cost
- albums0
anyone else getting this message at that site?
"This site requires JavaScript. Please enable it."
JavaScript works on every other site...
- albums0
anyone else getting this message at that site?
"This site requires JavaScript. Please enable it."
JavaScript works on every other site...