Discuss this insanity

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 7 Responses
  • pumpaction0

    Caution on Twitter urged as tourists barred from US
    Holidaymakers have been warned to watch their words after two friends were refused entry to the US on security grounds after a tweet.
    Before his trip, Leigh Van Bryan wrote that he was going to "destroy America".
    He insisted he was referring to simply having a good time - but was sent home.
    Trade association Abta told the BBC that the case highlighted that holidaymakers should never do anything to raise "concern or suspicion in any way".
    The US Department for Homeland Security picked up Mr Bryan's messages ahead of his holiday in Los Angeles.
    The 26-year-old bar manager wrote a message to a friend on the micro-blogging service, saying: "Free this week, for quick gossip/prep before I go and destroy America."
    The Irish national told the Sun newspaper that he and his friend Emily Bunting were apprehended on arrival at Los Angeles International Airport before being sent home.
    "The Homeland Security agents were treating me like some kind of terrorist," Mr Bryan said.
    "I kept saying they had got the wrong meaning from my tweet."
    No joke
    Abta, which represents travel companies in the UK, said holidaymakers need to learn to be ultra-cautious when it comes to talking about forthcoming trips, particularly after 9/11.
    "Airport security staff do not have a sense of humour when it comes to potential risk”

    "Posting statements in a public forum which could be construed as threatening - in this case saying they are going to "destroy" somewhere - will not be viewed sympathetically by US authorities," it told the BBC.
    "In the past we have seen holidaymakers stopped at airport security for 'joking' that they have a bomb in their bag, thoroughly questioned and ending up missing their flights, demonstrating that airport security staff do not have a sense of humour when it comes to potential risk."
    In another tweet, Mr Bryan made reference to comedy show Family Guy saying that he would be in LA in three weeks, annoying people "and diggin' Marilyn Monroe up".
    Mr Bryan told the newspaper that he was questioned for five hours about his Twitter messages.
    'Tweeter account'
    After the interview, Homeland Security's reported: "Mr Bryan confirmed that he had posted on his Tweeter website account that he was coming to the United States to dig up the grave of Marilyn Monroe.
    "Also on his tweeter account Mr Bryan posted he was coming to destroy America."
    The US Customs and Border Protection agency said in a statement that it tried to maintain a balance between "securing our borders while facilitating the high volume of legitimate trade and travel that crosses our borders every day".
    It added: "We strive to achieve that balance and show the world that the United States is a welcoming nation."
    Mr Bryan is not the only person to suffer from a misjudged tweet. In January 2010, Paul Chambers tweeted that he would blow snow-affected Robin Hood Airport in Doncaster "sky high!" if it was not reopened in time for him to see his girlfriend.
    He was fined £385 plus £2,600 in costs - a sum which actor Stephen Fry offered to pay on Mr Chambers' behalf.

  • Morning_star0

    That's septics for you. Act first, think later.

  • panacea0

    Be careful what you say. The old adage still holds true.

  • zoozoo0

    The internet sucks now.

  • mikotondria30

    "Airport security staff do not have a sense of humour when it comes to potential risk”
    It's not a sense of humour that is needed by the airport staff. They don't have to HAVE a sense of humour to understand that the comment is not intended to be taken literally. They just have to have a basic understanding of literary style.
    What they're doing by saying that they don't have a sense of humour is recognising that the statement that caused the fuss wasn't intended to be taken literally, but that they're deliberately mis-interpreting the statements as if they were. One cannot simply declare that one does not understand something - this is not a valid transaction in the exchange; if one truly believes something is unclear then one asks for clarification.
    "What does this mean ?" is a useful phrase.
    To declare both that a statement isn't meant to be taken literally - by indicating that they think "humour" is involved, and then also to declare that they do not understand that it isn't meant to be taken literally is utterly nonsensical by their own standards.
    Which is it, "Airport Authority" -
    a) You DO understand that the statements were not intended to be taken at face value, and therefore are not evidence of any substantive threat (this begin your sole position to investigate),
    b) You do NOT understand anything beyond the language and communicative style of a 5 year old, and are deliberately ignoring any attempts to understand it.
    c) There is no "c". You understand irony or you don't. That is the nature of 'not'. Things are or they are not, there is no third way - there is no "not not".

    Your attempts at literary critique are highly inappropriate.

    • I was once given a pat-down by a gorgeous lady solider in an Israeli airport. One thing they do right.waterhouse
    • they deliberately ignored the meaning and went after him to make a big scene in the mediaGminor
  • Gminor0

    hey everyone DO NOT be careful of what you say. The authorities and security are intentionally creating a culture of fear and intimidation. This guy was singled out to make an example of for the media, they love highlighting the twitter aspect too. The biggest security measure you can take is common sense and clearly the US security have none.