E-Cat (cold fusion sigh..)
- Started
- Last post
- 28 Responses
- georgesIII
I've been following Rossi's works since last year when I saw his filmed experiment in Bologna university,
but I've been deceived many time by others so called scientist who claimed "free energy" but never backed it with anything tangible,now here we are in 2012 and his invention is taking a big step into commercialization, imagine how the world could look like if every houses, transportation, factories could be fitted with an E-cat.
this invention could simply end all wars overnight, I may be over simplifying the situation but imagine not having to go around the world pillaging it for liquid gold.
now lets hope he doesn't shoot himself in the head twice from behind
http://e-catalyzer.it/
http://www.focus.it/andrea-rossi…
http://pesn.com/2011/05/31/95018…here: last year experiment in bologna's university to get you started
- moldero0
lol @ "lets hope he doesn't shoot himself in the head twice from behind"
- georgesIII0
here's another good link for those like me, first believed it was a huge scam, this could be the real deal (better fuckn be, please don't be a scam)
- _niko0
A)If it's too good to be true it probably is.
B) if this actually worked he'd be dead by now. Too many people in power with too much to lose.
C) Smells of old school alchemy, trying to turn lead into gold.
- _niko0
But I would also like to add:
- uan0
- that was just a guy in his computer room with a lame voiceover and nothing to back it. :(monospaced
- sine0
a primer:
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/arch…some debate:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/201…
- GeorgesII0
don't worry, if it doesn't work I already have my train ticket to go kick his ass,
if it does work, I'll go shake is hand in person.
- animatedgif0
"If energy prices go down across the board, theoretically goods will become much cheaper, and people won't need to work in the same way that they do now just to survive."
Doomed from the start, people at the top of the pile would never let this happen.
- monospaced0
"Doomed from the start," free energy is impossible.
- laws of physics, innitsine
- close mindedjadrian_uk
- me, close minded? I'm being realistic jadrian. it's simply impossible, and it will be proven againmonospaced
- and again, and againmonospaced
- mono, you were probably the kind of person who were saying that another earth like planet were impossible 15 years ago..GeorgesII
- or photographing black holes, or communicating world wide on a handset or eating kraft dinnerGeorgesII
- nah man, not at all, I love this shit and WISH it were true, but riht now even THEY don't believe itmonospaced
- there's no "proof," just evidence, and they're waiting to seemonospaced
- vaxorcist0
wait...
Balony University?!?!?
- you know that's a city with some of the oldest university/school in europe :)GeorgesII
- hahahahahamonospaced
- fuck now I'm hungryGeorgesII
- I know.... it's true that it's a historical university, but I couldn't resist....vaxorcist
- monospaced0
I hate this kind of stuff when it comes to these free energy trials:
"The reactor itself, which is loaded with the nickel powder and secret catalysts pressurized with hydrogen, has an estimated volume of 50 cubic centimeters (3.2 cubic inches)."
Why secret? What are you hiding? Why can't you just publish it so people can get on with creating free energy? Oh wait, it's secret. Such bullshit.
- do you know how a iphone or ipad works, why should he just give it away when he sold his house to finance it. free energy doesn't meanGeorgesII
- doesn't mean give your work for free, but giving the possibility to people to not be linked to big corporationsGeorgesII
- There is a difference between patented and 'secret'maikel
- terrible analogymonospaced
- GeorgesII0
I'm just as skeptic as anyone, but I'll just wait and see,
if it's another scam we'll find it sooner than later
- GeorgesII0
I'm not at home, but I found another great link from another third rate university aka cambridge, watch the video,
I want to believe
-http://sms.cam.ac.uk/media/11502…
In January 2011 Andrea Rossi demonstrated a device that purported to develop 10 kW of power from a nuclear reaction. This video discusses its credibility, the investigations that have been done on the device, and its future prospects. The nuclear power claim can be tested by measuring total energy over a period of time and comparing it with what would be possible from conventional energy sources[1]. Previous claims of this kind, beginning with that of Fleischmann and Pons in 1989 [2], have been generally doubted, but it is argued that this general doubt owes more to the persuasive power of rhetoric than to the actual facts.
In contrast to the ITER thermonuclear project, where practical application is decades away, reactors of the Rossi type are already in production and, according to NASA Chief Scientist Dennis M. Bushnell, may be capable of "completely changing geo-economics, geo-politics, and solving climate and energy"[3].
- sine0
oxygen is free, but if you want it in a cannister you pay for it.
in theory, creating this energy would be free... doesn't mean the people with the technology to make it is going to be giving it away for free.
/end ramble
- monospaced0
sine: "in theory, creating this energy would be free..."
What theory is that? Problem is, they aren't even sure what exactly is responsible for creating the energy, so it's premature to call it "free." And, if they wanted to really save the world, they wouldn't keep it secret, they'd share it with physicists to test and prove. If it's secret, it won't be free or liberating.
- detritus0
mono - this is NOT free energy and that video above is from NASA.
http://technologygateway.nasa.go…
Everyone's being massively hesitant around this subject now with good reason, but just as equally, this tech needn't necessarily rely on impossible physics ... just the '99%' of physics we don't understand yet.
Georges - Could you please link me to something that proves we've photographed a black hole and/or could you send me a link to proof of another 'Earth-like planet', as far as I'm aware, we have no evidence for either right now.
Unless, of course, you meant 'event horizon' around Black hole, and/or planets about Earth's size... but by that metric, so is Venus, and we've known about her for a good few years now.
- Sorry, 'no evidence for having photographed a black hole', which is by it's very nature, impossible.detritus
- dzing!jadrian_uk
