Photoshop Q: Gradual Effects
- Started
- Last post
- 30 Responses
- fugged0
It would be cool, if you could use a mask as filter strength, rather than just opacity.
- or any filter parameter, for that matter.fugged
- <<<monospaced
- <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<DoTheMacarena
- <<<.bigtrickagain
- Noggin0
I could be wrong (due to abysmal memory) but Im sure I was able to do this years ago with PS.
- DoTheMacarena0
Yeah I'd like to know the same. Seems like it would be an obvious option for PS.
Otherwise, you can always use a node based compositing software to do it (eg shake or nuke). AE will do it depending on which plugin you're using.
- monospaced0
Hmmm...I think I found the answer.
http://www.qbn.com/topics/597931…Just a little comic relief. Carry on. And keep us posted.
- CyBrain0
I concur with the need to manually filter different sections of your image. I wish Adobe would develop and intensity mask for layer effects.
- Adobe, are you reading thiis?monospaced
- start twittering about it. they'll see it.fugged
- Yes we are. We have a breakfast meeting about this tomorrow morning. I'll let you know as soon as we are done. :)OSFA
- Nice. I mean, seriously, this is Adobe's market speaking right here.monospaced
- Noggin0
Any joy with the above?
- Noggin0
Im pretty sure theres a market for a plugin that could do this (royalties please), then Adobe will purchase the company.
- lumedia0
you mean like what fade vs. opacity does, but with the control of using a mask?
- ornj0
If you are talking about a filter, after you apply it if you go to edit menu there will be an option, to Fade [last filter used].
- sorry, that's not itmonospaced
- That's the same as turning down the opacity on a layer with the effect. No dice.monospaced
- CyBrain0
I put it on Dear Adobe along with this peeve.
When duplicating layers and layer groups, stop appending copy at the end. No one wants to look at logo copy 12.