Sayonara Flash?
Sayonara Flash?
- Started
- Last post
- 25 Responses
- CyBrain0
I've seen plenty of expandable and all kinds of rich media Flash ads on Firefox. I've seen them, tested them, etc.
- This is just more anti-Flash propaganda. html5 will never offer the features Flash does. Get over it.CyBrain
- can you click through them to the html content - things like links and live text?SlashPeckham
- Yes, if you implement it.rounce
- ta - i'll check this out...SlashPeckham
- Amicus0
I think FireFox will quickly move to support this. I mean, there's no reason why they wouldn't, is there?
- firefox doesn't fully support flash anyway (overlay ads dont work in that browser)SlashPeckham
- Yep they do, you're doing it wrong!rounce
- they would need to re-encode every video, Firefox only supports shitty OGGBIGGESTDOGINTHEWORLD
- BIGGESTDOGINTHEWORLD0
_
Because some of us don't want to use 90% of their processor to view a low quality video of cats. When their computer can normally do HD video with way under 50% processor usage
- shitehawke0
May I ask, why?
What benefits does this have apart from not using a third party plugin?
- i think you've answered that yourselfSlashPeckham
- mostly starting another browser warAutokern
- Benefits? Less proprietary restrictions and more in line with the original, open nature of the WWW.detritus
- Would it be right to need a plugin to view an HTML page just containing pictures? Why should video be different?detritus
- Flash adoption is so high that there is no benefit not using it.CyBrain
- That's a remarkably short-sighted observation.detritus
- The benefit of not using Flash is not having to use Flash.MondoMorphic
- GeorgesII0
no FF support
FF.FFFFffffffuuuuuuuuuuu- They want people to use Chrome.lukus_W
- they can also kiss my ass.Autokern
- blame Firefox for only supporting an inferior codecBIGGESTDOGINTHEWORLD
- SlashPeckham
@iA
YouTube Now Testing HTML5 as Alternative to Flash: http://daringfireball.net/linked…