Emerging visual styles 2010
- Started
- Last post
- 56 Responses
- janne760
webpages which self scale on monitors to the exact magnitude preferred by the viewer
- janne760
the long anticipated return of Arial
- janne760
Everybody starts using the new Eric Gill homage typeface made out of dogs
- janne760
donkeys drinking coke light
- janne760
that or papyrus
- janne760
mooh
- utopian0
- wish mine had a head at both ends, then I could..
oh no, wait..mikotondria3
- wish mine had a head at both ends, then I could..
- Mal0
Roots of quadratic polynomials
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/ro…
- arthur0
texture
- gramme0
I predict a mild digital backlash. Less web, more print. Call me a sentimental and biased print (mostly) designer, but people are very slowly starting to realize that printing—when executed responsibly—is not really much more wasteful (if at all) than screen-based work. The notion that saving trees in favor of websites is always more sustainable is, in fact, incorrect. The truth is that the waste is substantial in both mediums: one being the production of paper, and the other being the usage of electricity. How it all balances out varies from one country to another, but I've heard a few people say that in the U.S. at least, print is often greener.
- people don't read paper because of eco-reasons. people read screen more because it's quick, cheap, easy.janne76
- Screen simply reaches more peopleukit
- who have their screen on already, while they're reading the print stuff. Print wastes screen time, and electricity.mikotondria3
- Print uses a lot less electricity. It's just different impacts.gramme
- but the screens are on ANYWAY, so anything else is a waste of resources..mikotondria3
- Who says the screens are always on? Mine isn't, not when I'm reading away from my desk at any rate.gramme
- janne760
bump
- honest0
heh?