logo crit
- Started
- Last post
- 24 Responses
- luckyorphan0
Second row.
- CygnusZero40
I prefer the first row.
- I kind of like the 2nd row, but would be better if the A and V where the different colors.CygnusZero4
- Hear hear.JamesThomson
- so 3 tones in the mark? One for "A", one for "V" and then overlap?soynutz7
- No overlap, A lighter color, V darker, but maybe have a white line separating. Just an idea.CygnusZero4
- hmmm, so... basically the first version:)soynutz7
- vitamins0
First or second row
- shitehawke0
the very first one, used like that, not stacked.
- JayCee0
3 and 4 row dos equis!
- JayCee0
2nd row is most interesting but I'm afraid the frailness of the mark will get lost.
- ismith0
1st row
- brandelec0
feels pharmaceutical
- yeah. name sounds real pharma too.baseline_shift
- agreed... hmmmsoynutz7
- brandelec0
- whoah, the mark reminds me of microsoft office for some reasonsoynutz7
- blecch!!Projectile
- utopian0
4th row, last logo
- Projectile0
it's a very quiet logo. I'd say boost it a little with stronger colour or weight.
I like the 1st two rows.. I like 2nd one but it'd need more weight. make the dark bit thicker.
- thx, i think im gonna try and fatten it up a bit so it reads better small.soynutz7
- 74LEO0
You need to put a falic vertical line in the middle .
- formed0
2nd row. I like the first row too, but second is unique (and agree with others that it needs more weight/thickness not to get lost)
- ukit0
I think the typeface is killing it. It's too friendly/pedestrian and adds to the pharma feel.
- Jimbo820
third row looks like a couple copulating in the missionary position
- hahah, nicesoynutz7
- hah, you look at too much pr0nbaseline_shift
- All I see is one body ploughing anotherJimbo82
- Thats what I like about tit..i mean it.74LEO
- version30
altAVista < maybe put your logo inside not on top