BNP on Question Time

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 136 Responses
  • vespa0

    hahaaaa did anyone see Russell Howard's Good News?

    Relevant bits from 5:10 onwards:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/epi…

  • GeorgesII0


    ahahaha
    (watch the entire skit, http://video.google.com/videopla…)

  • Orbit0

    "One is that anyone who votes BNP probably doesn't watch question time."

    I reckon a lot of them would have done though, purely because it will have been trumpeted as a great leap forward for their resistance movement, but I think you are right anyway in the sense that anyone watching Question Time for the first time, purely to see the debate, will only have concluded that that the show was merely a bunch of lefty do-gooder intellectuals trying to undermine their views and fears, and embarrass them. They will hold that lefty do-gooder faction responsible for the growing mess they perceive, so those that did watch will possibly have been galvanised by the experience and their loyalty to the BNP will have been strengthened.

  • lowimpakt0

    would anyone here be able to physically shut the door on someone looking for help?

    I know we are comfortable with a faceless bureaucracy do the dirty work for us but could we do it ourselves?

    I recently expereinced an immigration raid on a restaurant in my neighbourhood. It was late at night and the cops and immigration people stormed the restaurant and pulled the family from upstairs (including women and children) through the restaurant full of customers. It was chaotic and they were being pulled out into a police van.

    it was shocking, dehumanising, and insanely embarrassing for the family/staff and it felt like the nazi's were in control. i wanted to challenge them but was blocked from doing so by a row of cops

    The way I see is that the actualy facts/statistics on the positive/negative impacts of immigration are contested but in many cases the economic impacts have more to do with incoherent policies and poor planning rather than immigrants themselves.

    And by contested I mean the figure coming from seperate arms of the government are different

    on the one hand positive - http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/doc…

    and on the other hand neutral/negative - http://www.publications.parliame…

  • kezza_20

    Just had a look at some stats from 2001, which is woefully out of date but... Gives you an idea as to why this shit is happening.

    Blackburn:

    According to the UK Government's 2001 census, Blackburn, defined as an urban area, had a population of 105,085 and a population density of 11,114/sq mi (4,291 /km2).[1] According to further statistics from the same census, this time defining Blackburn as a Westminster parliamentary constituency, the town was 69.22% White British (national average for England 89.99%) with significant Indian (14.31%) and Pakistani (11.45%) ethnic minorities.[63]

    12.33% of the population was born outside the European Union.[64] In terms of religion, 57.53% of residents were Christian (average for England 71.74%), 25.74% Muslim (average for England 3.1%) and 15.98% no religion or not stated.[65]

    With regard to the economic activity of those aged 16–74, the 2001 Census indicates that 33.93% were full-time employees (average for England 40.81%), 11.72% were part-time employees, 5.97% were self-employed (average for England 8.32%), and 4.5% were unemployed (average for England 3.35%).

  • kezza_20

    lowimpakt, I understand your experience. being the son of 2 irish immigrants I can hardly speak, but when you have 5 million on benefits and 3 million unemployed, at what point do we say we don't need anyone else just yet???

    I dont know the answer by the way

    • Is there actually a link between unemployed / people on benefits, and immigration levels? aren't they separate issues?vespa
    • ... issues?vespa
  • lowimpakt0

    i don't have the answer either but the amount of people on benefits and unemployed will always go up and down and I would caution againt bringing in discriminatory and retrograde policies that target people because of wider macro-economic problems.

    i.e. I don't think we can treat immigration/migration like a tap.

    I think that "people" display similar characteristics to market forces. For example, Ireland (my home) experienced massive immigration from Poland and places like that over the last 10 years as the economy boomed. The inflow of immigrants is reducing now that the economy is in the shit.

    The problem there is that the messed up economy wasn't caused by immigrants (in fact they contributed to the boom) and now the problem is that as Ireland tries to rebuild the economy the very people it will depend on (hard working people) are heading back home and shifting the sands of economic development.

    does that make any sense?

  • Ianbolton0

    thinking about it, maybe it's time for some kind of radical movement. Let's get the BNP to sort our country out. That means major cuts in art, design, music and general cultural activities. That's all for rich upper class twats anyway.

    Come on Nick, do it for the country. Really sort us out. Make us feel that true British pride. The love and passion you show your wife after drinking some foreign beer every night.

    Is Nick Griffin married??

  • moth0

    Yeah Kelpie took MY job. Literally. Not content with London taxes subsidising his own Country, he has to come steal from me too.

  • KarlFreeman0

    Some of the points here is exactly why I'm getting the hell out of Britain, emigrating to greener pastures without all this bull. How BNP got enough floating votes to put them in a situation where the BBC deemed it necessary to air there policies is completely down to the underdog's of Britain not feeling like the government is doing enough about the causes which BNP is riding to get votes such as too much immigration and change.

    Until the government actually do something about clearly a lot of peoples concern of the immigration, BNP will gain more votes even if its fucking crazy.

    • Btw, I have no issue with immigration becuase that would be very ironic of me ;)KarlFreeman
  • moth0

    bnp would keep the cute polish girls though eh?

  • kezza_20

    @Vespa

    I dont think there is a direct link, but when you have 8 million people not working, then how can the mainstream parties say we need immigration to fill jobs... Thats why the BNP do well, is they can say to the unemployed..."look at what the governments doing, the're giving your job to that Indian guy"...

    For the first time in my lifetime, when I went home last week there are groups of lads not working. I mean normally its the margins that dont work in a down turn, but now its like 18-25 year old lads. That more than anything scares the fuck out of me.

    Makes me so angry when last night someone said that the person from Africa is more willing to empty a bin that and english person. Seriously go to Preston and say that.

    I'm lucky to earn a good wage these days, and pay a lot of tax. But when you look at the figures it makes your eyes water. Roughly every person working pays for 2 people that dont/cant/retired/to young. That seems unsustainable to me...

    I actually sound like Jan Moir...

    These are thoughts rather than beliefs so dont shout at me too much

  • BIGGESTDOGINTHEWORLD0

    _
    "anyone who votes BNP probably doesn't watch question time."

    Its not about changing the mind of the FUCKING MORONS who vote BNP, and they are morons every last fucking one of them (yes if your middle england parents voted for them then your parents are fucking morons).
    Its about getting the people who know better to get to the fucking voting office to outweigh these morons. So many people who know the BNP are wrong just can't be bothered to get to the voting office.

    • good rant. Just think people who call people who vote for the BNP morons are missing the point...kezza_2
  • KarlFreeman0

    @kezza_2

    As someone who is 18-25 seeing my peers not working terrifies me even more. I have been fortunate to of had a good upbringing with a core value of working hard being enforced very young but I couldn't agree more with you when about the tax's. I'm paying at the moment for my peers to lounge around on benefits. Its mental, I know your feeling about someone from different backgrounds being more willing to work than an English person but there is an underlying feeling that young Britain, is benefits a Britain.

  • lowimpakt0

    there is a need for an educational and social catch up on the realities of the sectors that are driving the UK economy - e.g. financial services, creative industries etc.

    people need to be put back at the centre of politics.

    there is a need for new indicators for the measurement of wealth and value in the economy. GDP is a bad indicator and has led to many of the problems the UK faces.

    there is a need to break down the targets and performance related systems for the delivery of public services. This is a challeneg for government, the service delivery boodies and importantly the users of services.

    there needs to be a new dialogue on quality and effectiveness.

  • gjd0

    This comment on the VICE article is what gets people supporting the BNP, and it's not a completely bad point. I hope they directly address this on Question Time tonight because I want to hear what they have to say. I live in Essex and see the BNP getting more and more popular and it's fuckin scary that majority rules might start overtaking the middle class dicks who shimmy them off with name-calling that simply drives their deviousness deeper.
    -------------

    I know, I know, if you're racist you're a horrible person, etc - I get it, I get it.

    BUT, what's happening in the UK is the government has adopted the policy of Canada and 'multiculturalism' and have put forth the view that there is no such thing as British culture, that all the immigrant cultures are just as relevant.

    This is conceivable for Canada because it's a brand-new country that really IS made up entirely of immigrants.

    This doesn't work for Britain, which has a genuine centuries-old culture. This is why there is enormous resentment against the immigrants who don't even TRY to adapt to local culture. It IS insulting and it doesn't make you racist.

    • It's not about the BNP, its about institutional racism - the BNP is just the facegjd
  • KarlFreeman0

    @BIGGESTDOGINTHEWORLD I'm going to raise my hand as someone who didn't vote which I'm sure will make your blood boil, my reasoning. Not because I couldn't be arsed more to do with that I didn't trust any of the parties to vote for. I've completely lost any hope with the government but when its time to vote, trust me. I'l be voting for something that is'nt BNP( even if I don't trust any of the crooks Il be voting for )

    • maybe the uprise of the BNP will encourage people to make a decision and vote. it's important.Ianbolton
  • Ianbolton0

    lowimpakt - i agree we can't turn immigration on and off like a tap, and I also don't really know the answer. The introduction of the points system, used pretty successfully in Australia, means they can raise and lower points as and when necessary, and in some way controlling the influx of immigrants. I'm not sure we can compare a system that works well in Australia though, looking at the size of their country to the size of ours. We need tougher measures. It's not about drawing the bridge and saying 'sorry we're closed'.
    Tighter measures to ensure we know who's coming in and where they are is the only way possible. Surely if they're claiming benefits too we can decide whether they deserve them, and whether they deserve to be here.

    When i look at british yob culture, skin headed hooded louts drinking special brew on the street corners, it worries me. The BNP almost encourage this behaviour by not encouraging a creative forward thinking culture. Without the arts, science and proper education we can safely say this extremely diverse country will be surely screwed.

    • Australia may be physically big but the reason it has a small population is due to limited resources like water.vespa
    • agreed, but the amount of people i met there working illegally, cash in hand, was unbelievable.Ianbolton
    • btw I worked cash in hand in Sydney for 18 months and didnt pay tax. Some fucking systemkezza_2
    • i was the same, farm work for 2 months, design work in melbourne and perth for 6 month. Cash in hand.Ianbolton
  • vespa0

    I wouldn't shout at you kezza, I'm just interested in what you think.

    There are equally offensive stereotypes circulating about lazy "english" people who won't do menial work -- but in all honesty all the cleaners I ever see are immigrants. Is this because there is some kind of immigrant Cleaning Mafia co-ordinating a UK wide discrimination policy against white british people?

    I'm an immigrant to the UK, as well as being the daughter of english and asian immigrants to Australia, so I may well have been brainwashed into thinking that the reason people emigrate is because they have the get up and go to make better lives for themselves, and that people of said mentality will work hard in any job that needs doing, but I appreciate that 1 idea does not necessarily follow the other.

    Seeing 18-25 year old people out of work is terrible, more so because a pattern set at that age has been shown to have a lasting effect on said peoples' levels of employment for the rest of their lives. I just don't know what it has to do with immigration.

  • calculator0

    Some good points there.

    @Vespa
    Isn't it just common sense to point out that if there are XX number of jobs in a country, that once those are filled everyone else will be unemployed? If "the mainstream parties say we need immigration to fill jobs" - that's clearly shite, isn't it? We need it to fill certain skill sets, we don't need more people to clear tables at KFC.

    As a tax payer, I don't want to support unemployed people. That's really difficult to stomach. I want everyone to work, support themselves and the country positively.

    There are some serious issues developing in the UK that someone needs to get to grips with sharpish (it won't be the BNP, so who will it be).