Logo crit
- Started
- Last post
- 30 Responses
- TomBac
This is something I'm working currently on.
I have doubt regarding letter "g". I looks somehow, well not looking at all. Then again if look at it seams somehow right.I have tried to stick with simple typography, since sign is carrier of overall design.
Then again if I look all of your opinions regarding logos, it seams like shit. But then again if I look on market, it seams that clear typeface and readability dominates. Hm..
What say dee?
- ********0
ya the G needs some work. maybe a little more space between the W and the mark too
- Jnr_Madison0
I kinda like it.
- detritus0
whilst i like rounded sans fonts like that - this one is awful.
avoid.
otherwise - there's something slightly vaginal about your logo, and aside from that, I'd like to see less variety in the stroke widths employed. You need more cohesion between the weights - bearing in mind that the font itself has a stroke weight. imo, this needs to match the weights in the graphic form.
- 'match' = being compatible with, not being the same. Christ, I think I'm wrecked. Shouldn't've skipped lunch.detritus
- <<<baseline_shift
- maybe it's just that g - the rest of the type is inoffensive.detritus
- monospaced0
What is weglow?
- a support group for people who have eaten plutonium.k0na_an0k
- will tell ya later. How does it seams. pls try to be specific with critic, so I can correct it.TomBac
- make it "glow" lolmonospaced
- akrokdesign0
i think you should redo it. you can still go with a rounded font, just pick an other. you will run into problem with that one, ex. if you need it small.
i have no idea what the mark are suppose to be. so, i would drop it.
- anytime someone asks for a crit here, people say "redo it!". how does anything get done?Milan
- tnx, akro, cheersTomBac
- you're welcome tom.akrokdesign
- ********0
move the tail on the G so it lines up with the edge of the O. Maybe then it won't look like a boner.
- Milan0
seams = seems, ffs!
- johndiggity0
the scale of elements in the mark is way off. they type needs work and doesn't really correlate to the mark, ie there are rounded forms and angular forms. the counter on the "e" is way too small compared to the other letters and is very distracting. i'd look at switching to a double storey g. there's really a lot of repetition with the circular elements that you could incorporate in the entire identity.
- TomBac0
baseline what is your opinion?
- akrokdesign0
yeah, that tail on the g has to be fixed. you could fill in the "e", "g" and "o" also, if you want to keep the font you have.
- era4O40
oops. take a look at the logo at the above link (which should've been below) and how they make it energetic, colorful and fun. Your, while decent in design, doesn't really "say" "we glow". maybe it's not meant to. I don't know what you do...in fact, we shouldn't really be having this conversation until we know what WEGLOW is.
- oh dude, that's fucked up...he might take you seriouslymonospaced
- man please do not offend my perspective on things around.TomBac
- akrokdesign0
your re-designing?....
- deliciousvitamins
- OK this one would look nice if that is brand for chewing gum.TomBac
- they sell glow sticks. :-Dakrokdesign
- TomBac0
Sign. Equatorial axis. Notice that width of smaller line goes in negative space (blue) which surrounds two circular forms which unifies.
Smaller line goes double with width and length in to middle line.
Smaller inner circle is double of length of smaller line.
Outline is width of smaller line. I tried to imbue mathematical rules
into this one.Planet Earth with Sun in background. And 3 lines are bursting rays.
23,44° - 90° = 65,66°- length of smaller lineTomBac
- nobody will ever get that.. although it might be interesting... everyone is going to ask when the hell is that blue shit********
- TomBac0
And then I tried to apply above mentioned rules in to letters.
Typeface is done by my smallness.
Hm, problem is that I tried to use few of rounded fonts. and all of them seams to distinguished a lot from sign.
I'm trying to imbue numbers in to letters. But it seams that that wouldn't workLogo should be for corporate identity.
- rkrd0
don't hate the messenger...
- akrokdesign0
- on the 2nd one, might want to customize the e.akrokdesign
- yeah 2 form of typeface is similar
to one I was drawing.TomBac - i like the second one********
- ********0
- or something like that********
- Thanks man. Cheers.TomBac
- NOOOOOOOOO!monospaced
- OOOOOOOOOOOOO!JayCee
- or something like that
- rkrd0
I don't think anyone would get the mark. Even after your explanation I still don't get it. On the type, a two-storey g was already mentioned, it's a good solution, and not that common with such purely geometric faces. the e is very, very dark, the crossbar doesn't need to be the same wight as the other strokes and it doesn't have to be mathematically circular either, rather optically.
