Studio Website Questions
- Started
- Last post
- 30 Responses
- Shaney0
forgot to add to above, before he tells you that it'll cause duplicate content issues or probs with Google.
1/ Text site should contain same text as flash site
2/ you put all your .swf's in one folder and then block that folder in a robots.txt file so googles hairy spider doesn't try index your flash files as well.
- d_rek0
Thank you for the validating responses (hehe)!
@Tresudek
The site uses minimal, minimal copy. Like an intro P's and that's about it. Outside of that there will be minimal web-safe text (some links and very small amount of copy). The problem I am having is that because of the extremely minimal amount of copy the site begins to feel very sparse using web-safe fonts.Unfortunately at the moment I have nothing I can show you. I will try and upload something to my flickr tomorrow for feedback.
Thanks again!
- don't forget your copy is vital for SEO as well - ie keyword denstiy etc...ckentish
- Coffeemaker0
don't be precise about type on your webs. typography is overrated. most clients don't give a shit about the font. they just want the forms to work and be able to see visitors coming back frequently.
- felizfeliz0
try googling "design studio".
if i was a client i wouldn't be hiring any in the top 10.
the top ten google results look so bad, if i was a design studio i wouldn't want to appear in the search results.poop to seo.
Just build a nice site, do great work. people will blog you, etc people will find you. in the real world people will talk about you. THAT's more important than appearing in the first page of a google search result page.
- felizfeliz0
the only important search is if people google your studio name(cos they're too lazy to type in the full web address), then you want it to appear at the top. and for that just add some meta description and keyword tags. that's all i've done. try googling "graham cross". i'm right there at the top, despite there being a famous footballer with the same name.
- d_rek0
@felizfeliz
Yeah the website is just a medium to show potential clients our work. I would say 90%+ of our clientbase is made through direct contact/referrals. We have a very aggressive salesperson who is very good at getting clients this way.
The website again is really just a way to for potential clients to get an idea of what we do.
I personally am not concerned about the SEO aspect of our studio website nor do I particularly believe our salesperson is either.
One of the big ideas driving the redesign of the site is that it be a tool for him to use when trying to corral potential clients.- while that tool should certainly be functional, it should also stylistically represent our companyd_rek
- d_rek0
bumppp
- airey0
it's horse shit. to SEO you simple use CSS image replacement. as a basic example take a look at my main menu top left of my site ( www.alloystudio.com.au ) it uses an unordered list for nav and simple uses css to form it and use images (gotham font with rollover). this is a solid SEO setup and incredibly common.
the same out of touch fuckwits that use this argument also still profess to the 'web safe 256 color palette' and build for 800 x 600 resolution.
SEO is important but it's crackajack assholes like that who seem to 'know something' and then forget to evolve that something. the technology moves fast. SEO doesn't mean to halt design it just means you design need to take it into account.
- also, i'd still stick with web-safe for any major areas of text. only use this kind of thing for special areas.airey
- just my 2 cents btw. i'm probably wrong.airey
- I think you're right airey -> the arguments put fwd are bull. Image replacement, cufon or sifr are all designed to be SEO friendlylukus_W
- friendly.lukus_W
- airey0
also, the translating argument is really odd. does he really believe that a site can be literally translated by apps like babel-fish online and that works?!? that images are the problem there?!? that's out there. engrish anyone.
- lambsy0
these SEO guys stick to their guns. no matter how stupid they sound.
prepare for war. actual knowledge of how CSS works is powerless against their stonewalled craniums.
- Rand0
I could give a shit about SEO... like a suitable client's gonna find a small studio like ours that way anyway... I'm not in the yellow pages, either
- acrossthesea0
Have a clean html site and then some sort of "experience" section where you go crazy w/ the flash/motion/whatever. Show that you can do both.
- airey0
i thought it worth adding that i think SEO is incredible important and offer a high level of it in my clients work. the issue for me is that there's a myth behind so much of it and it's treated like some after-market specialty. if you do web then you should do seo. sites should be built with this in mind full-stop. the level of priority should be on a sliding scale with budget, timeframes and a balance of what the client wants to communicate versus the importance of search visibility.
the problems is fucking idiots who actually read jacob neilson and buy into his horseshit. if you're selling a product on or offline then visually it needs to be top-notch. web work should not be at a cost of the structure and therefore SEO viability but a complete package. people need to find it but when they do it should also 'sell' itself. if it's the greatest SEO but looks like a bulletin board from 1996 you're going to get a billion hits and a billion immediate bounces. better you get the half a billion hits and the half a billion sales.
my 2 cents, i'm probably wrong.
- TResudek0
Using cufon or sifr to replace body copy is a ridiculous waste of resources and bandwidth. People are used to seeing web-safe fonts and a little extra attention to typography goes a long way.
As for using an image for body copy, that is totally lame. No SE compliance and no way for me to copy and paste. No way to make hover links even... just a silly thought and you should be ashamed to have mentioned it.
- i don't agree with the first point but agree with the 2nd. at least we're covering multiple views here.airey
- Shaney0
If you wanna use Flash and keep SEO safe for want of a better expression and don't have loads of text use swfobject with yo text in the div that swf object replaces.
Thats all you need. no sifr cufun or any replacement tricks needed, just keep the div text same content as Flash text and your all set. Google safe etc if thats a concern
- google reckons it can read flash text/links etc but always fooks it upShaney
- must_dash0
Your site doesn't need to look like it has SEO, it just needs to use it. If you're a design studio and your site just looks like an SEO wet dream they'll think thats all you do if it has compromised on design.
- johndiggity0
use flash and set up a google business account. most people searching for agencies specify some type of geographical descriptor (advertising+philadelphia). if you set up an account with google you'll show up in the local business results on the map ahead of all the organic results.
- gramme0
If you're dealing with potential clients that are agencies and other people with a (supposed) higher aesthetic sense, then I don't see why Flash is bad if typography is a cornerstone of your work. Especially because these days you CAN make Flash at least somewhat SEO friendly by leaving text unembedded (I don't know the technical term, but there is a way to preserve appearance of whatever fonts you want, as well have type that can be selected, copied, etc).
And according to version3, you can deep-link in Flash now. Believe me, the guy harrassed me about it and found a way to do it. ;)
Of course, none of the above was done on my site, not because of limitations on skt's part, but because of my budget. Maybe next time. I'm aware my site is not at all SEO friendly.
- skt0
we get all our work from google.