Ripped again!
- Started
- Last post
- 74 Responses
- _niko0
plus he only used your beautiful images as a background to enhance the logos.
- _niko0
plus they're Bulgarian so what can you do...
- Meeklo0
- wtf!VectorMasked
- it's so true meeklo... it's so truejimzyk
- kerus0
watermark your shiz
- kerus0
agreed, your photos are fantastic esp seeing the "free" alternatives which im dropping my spare credits on ;)
- ********0
you have a patent on blurred disks?
- version30
THESE ARE NOT YOURS!
I hate caps but want to make a point.
None of your images line up with the linked 'culprit'
- pr20
This conversation is really counterproductive. Yes, those were his exact images used in the other person's work. You have to be blind not to see it -- which makes me wonder what you are doing in the field that requires vision to operate...
So we shouldn't spend half the comments on trying to prove whether those were or not or if so how it can be proven... Because, you really can't do anything about it especially since the creative energy behind it was relatively low (meaning it didn't take that long to create those images).
Was it stealing, yes it was, but thankfully at most you lost $40 rather then $400 or $4000.
- not stealing. just copying and repurposing._niko
- _niko -> in which case, what point would it become steeling?********
- it's like pirated songs. you're not stealing, just copying and using. But if you took someones song and passed it off as your own and tried to make money on it then it would be stealing._niko
- off as your own and tried to make money on it then it would be stealing._niko
- fate_0
Version3, quit being an idiot. They are the exactly 100kr's images, cropped, and then photographed at an angle. If you can't see that, you probably don't have any business being a designer. Attention to detail: you lack it.
The rest of you harping on "it looks close but..." Get a clue. This guy used 100kr's work. There's no argument about that.
- _niko0
did Duchampe "steal" the mona lisa?
- might be a bad example but it's not like the guy was passing off the photograph of lights as his own._niko
- he only used it as a background element, secondary to his logo/typography design._niko
- it doesn't matter - he could have asked.. at the very least it was rude -> the equivalent of saying fuck you, i'll do what i want********
- want********
- I agree, he should have asked or at least gave credit._niko
- he didn't steal it. it's public domainsikma
- pr20
I tell you what if that other guys does something as cool with 100's images as Duchamp did, i'll let it slid......... But he didn't.
- fate_0
Version3, do you not understand the concept of perspective?
- version30
I've rotated, stretched, titled, and skewed his images and in no way can fit one to another
- fate_0
Here, I've tried to make this as simple as possible for you...
Maybe you're not cut out for design...you do need eyes and a brain, afterall. Seems you're lacking one of those things.
- version30
ok i admit defeat on the purple one mentioned by point 5 and i finally got the "u" to match up but i had been concentrating on the "well done" which i still can't match up
- version30
the guy is a fontographer, he photographed his fonts layered on your pictures from an lcd screen, not for sale, contact him if you have a problem http://www.behance.net /Simov
- kelpie0
lol@nico's duchampe defence.
I can see Marcel now actually, giving it "well oui, I simply wanted a nice generic background for my wonderful representative painting of a moustache, so I used this old thing"