Museum of London
- Started
- Last post
- 27 Responses
- Fariska0
Not bad actually.
Follows the trend of all London Institution to appear young and cool.
And the webiste doesn't look bad at all.And is kinda limiting judging a whole system from just the logo.
- calcium0
- I just want to make sure I never delete my blob.ai files.calcium
- http://www.creativer…digdre
- whats that studio pic digree?uan
- Gordy220
Shame the Museum is shit really.
- OSFA0
I don't mind it, but I remember when MAD came out with their new identity, people went apeshit and complained about everything...
- JG_LB0
i like it
- Jaline0
I don't mind it. The old one wasn't bad though.
- janne760
it also happens in my old hometown :(
but then taken a step further into landscape architecture even.a huge infotainment/edutainment (pls shoot me now) experienceshopping/education/spo... whatever megacenter.
totally taking away the sight on the monumental landmarks when approaching, i fear.. but well, i'll have to see, maybe i am simply too conservative.
- anxiousarms0
i guess i just dont get how the new imagery speaks to the fact that it's a museum. you can be youthful and modern but still speak to your cause.
and i think the type isn't fitting for the rest of the very active looking imagery.
- Fariska0
Organic is the new.... is the new. Period.
- janne760
well, here in NL there's a lot of debate about the future of the museum. recently a museum was completely rebranded and rebuilt to an educational experience, with more video/screens/interaction and less glass boxes. it was a pretty much debated move..
- digdre0
is that font DIN 1451?
- digdre0
I actually like the logo, the old one was nice aswell, but this one, nice branding oppurtunities in my opinion.