iStockphoto.com
- Started
- Last post
- 11 Responses
- Raniator
Alternatives?
- CFish0
Fotolia.co.uk
- Daro0
- radar0
digital camera
- brian0
veer or gettyimages if your clients have deep pockets. Right now I'm looking at a co that says "stay away from lifestyle shots that indicate facial expressions/skin color/gestures"
and I was just told...
http://www.jupiterimages.com/
http://www.fotosearch.com/
http://www.dreamstime.com/
- honest0
Erm, doesn't Getty OWN istock?
- ETM0
Erm, doesn't Getty OWN istock?
honest
(Oct 8 07, 11:11)Yes... but pricing and offerings are significantly different.
- Raniator0
Cool, thanks guys.
I'll check out those links.
Looking for 'cheap' alternatives. iStockphoto is good, but it pisses me off having to put 'image courtesy of...' or whatever it needs to say next to each fucking image...
Want to compare others and see what's what.
Nice one.
- wunderbra0
"Looking for 'cheap' alternatives. iStockphoto is good, but it pisses me off having to put 'image courtesy of...' or whatever it needs to say next to each fucking image..."
Don't think you have to. Don't think most people do. It'd be silly in a lot of cases. It's stockphotography.
- wunderbra0
"use the Content for editorial purposes without including the following credit adjacent to the Content: “©iStockphoto.com/Artist’s Member Name];"
aha, editorial purposes! ofcourse, seems fair. in an ad it would be odd. or in a website header.
- tyranisus0
only in editorial
- wunderbra0
yes