Web 2.0
- Started
- Last post
- 41 Responses
- Teeuwen0
tis about purdy colours and type without little dingledangies on the end, they call it sans-serif. also there is a lot of white and big type combined with very small type. type are letters, like the alphabet, a to z. remember sesame's street??
- Rand0
I said WHY goddamn you
- Teeuwen0
BECAUSE THIS IS THE FUTURE, GODDAMN KID!
without floating buildings and flying cars though..
- bolus0
that belongs in the name thread
- Rand0
you're a dead man
- Teeuwen0
not yet, father..
- monkeyshine0
working on a social wiki app and another social app using lots of ajax fancy pants.
spent the last three months working on a client-side download manager for video rentals.
- jaymac440
haven't messed with ajaz yet, but we use it at work. I have many clients asking me what RSS is. Some of our clients are amazed at some of the new stuff we can do for them
- joyride0
with all these new terms clients are wanting the thing they don't realize is the cost goes up considerly. It's not just a static website anymore, it's a web application. Time is money
- jaymac440
baby needs a new pair of ipods
- emokid0
web 2.0 is associated with a visual look because designers felt left out when this whole thing started. we needed a bone thrown to us and here we have one. otherwise we might as well shoot ourselves.
- exador10
lots of web2.0 stuff going on around here..
currently working on a geo-tracking 'where ya wanna go for coffee' type of web app, with a mobile app to go with it...
well..when i say 'im' doing it..what i mean is we have a bunch of eggheads here that do all the code and smart stuff, and then i come in and make it look all snazzy and cool..i 'may' even be tempted to make the new logo all shiny and ad a reflection underneath it..
just to piss off Jevad...
;)
wasn't he the one that posted that thread about hating the web2.0 design trends?anyhow, thats what we're up to here...
- radiculture0
ohh, that yayhooray thread is funny...