< fujufiml logo
- Started
- Last post
- 10 Responses
- indian_pole
bad typography. mingin. why?
- tomkat0
the 1980s is great
- indian_pole0
the 1980s is great
tomkat
(Jul 13 06, 00:37)agreed
- Fariska0
at least it don't has gradients, blurs and is still capitalized.
But is flat and uninteresting.
the old one is way better.
- agentfour0
im not deeply offended by it and i dont think its cheesy crap like a lot of logos nowadays.....so therefore its oK......for now
- cresp0
i don't mind it, but the 1934 one rocks.
- Mojo0
Don't see anything wrong with it, I think that logo would be good in some nice motion work, the whole balance of it is good.
- WorkOslo0
Hell of a lot better than the new KODAK logo. It is not great, but it's justifiably not a great departure from what they have. It's ok.
- WorkOslo0
Ref. my previous comment
- phatlee0
I like it...
- indian_pole0
the notch on the 'f' and the indent on the 'i' are all over the freakin place, really uncomfortable in my opinion.
but i'm exaggerating the mingin-ness, theres alot worse out there, but it's not as good as it's predecessors.