9/11 Pentagon Tape
- Started
- Last post
- 481 Responses
- denvergreenbud0
"which there blatantly were and dead charred bodies"
I haven't seen this can you point me toward the link?
- Visia0
actually, there are no photos that show plane wreckage at all. Which is why everyone is wondering where the plane went.
Have you even looked into this before you started spouting off?
- Visia0
or dead charred bodies either.
- mpfree0
actually, there are no photos that show plane wreckage at all. Which is why everyone is wondering where the plane went.
Have you even looked into this before you started spouting off?
Visia
(May 16 06, 12:18)I just posted one above
- mrdobolina0
Kona, I just can't help it, you come off as such a prick all the time, I just have to fuck with you.
- chz0
FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT!
- ********0
leave it rasko.
- Visia0
mpfree, where? Can you post the link again please.
- denvergreenbud0
with all of this circular reasoning I would have to say there are a lot of christians on NT
- denvergreenbud0
I can't find the link either
please repost
- k0na_an0k0
Here you go denvergreenbud. Smoke on this.
--
FACT: When American Airlines Flight 77 hit the Pentagon's exterior wall, Ring E, it created a hole approximately 75 ft. wide, according to the ASCE Pentagon Building Performance Report. The exterior facade collapsed about 20 minutes after impact, but ASCE based its measurements of the original hole on the number of first-floor support columns that were destroyed or damaged. Computer simulations confirmed the findings.Why wasn't the hole as wide as a 757's 124-ft.-10-in. wingspan? A crashing jet doesn't punch a cartoon-like outline of itself into a reinforced concrete building, says ASCE team member Mete Sozen, a professor of structural engineering at Purdue University. In this case, one wing hit the ground; the other was sheared off by the force of the impact with the Pentagon's load-bearing columns, explains Sozen, who specializes in the behavior of concrete buildings. What was left of the plane flowed into the structure in a state closer to a liquid than a solid mass. "If you expected the entire wing to cut into the building," Sozen tells PM, "it didn't happen."
- Visia0
mpfree, if you're talking about the funeral photos that you posted then your definition of evidence is pretty far off.
- denvergreenbud0
that isn't a photo
- denvergreenbud0
fuck christ
- Visia0
no offense Kona but I just plain don't believe that the impact would turn steel to liquid.
- mpfree0
In the heap of debris next to the hole lies an airliner wheel hub from one of the landing gears (as shown on TLC's "Pentagon Under Fire," aired 9/11/02):
- k0na_an0k0
Kona, I just can't help it, you come off as such a prick all the time, I just have to fuck with you.
mrdobolina
(May 16 06, 12:20)You seem to be the only one who thinks so, and, the only one who's childish enough to 'fuck with me' because you think i'm 'a prick'.
What's the difference really between that childish act and you bitching about jazx for having different screen names that is a 'childish act' as you put it?
Fucking hypocrit. Fuck off.
- Visia0
and I agree with Denvergreenbud, it's just not photographic evidence.
I've got a quote from William Turnbull from the FCC that states "the questions surrounding the state of the airplane after impact with the Pentagon are considered scientifically valid and are under investigation by the FCC."
That was said the 9/12/01. Eventually nothing else came of it.
- mpfree0
I'm not going to go into the bodies part, they are never going to release such macabre content man. I know what my friend has told me, it's enough for me.
Like I said believe what you want to believe.
You probably also believe in Roswell Aliens.
- Jaline0
100