Faith Schools
- Started
- Last post
- 336 Responses
- discipler0
ah, misread that post, scarabin. Good catch.
- ********0
Only that which has a beginning requires a cause. That which by nature is without beginning, does not require a cause.
discipler
(Oct 13 05, 06:50)Sounds more like philosophy to me, which has fuck all to do with anything other than man's eternal drinking and talking crap to one another. You may as well use Wikipedia to argue your point.
- stphn0
you've GOTTA have faith... a faith... a faith ahhh
www.bbc.co.uk/totp2/fe... [jpg]
gruntt
(Oct 13 05, 06:53)Dont you need faith to believe eveything came from an "exploding dot"? There is more evidence against it than for it.
- discipler0
rule #1 moth, never use wikidpedia to support anything. it's for the people BY the people and loaded with bias.
- -scarabin-0
so you are choosing to believe your own "version" of christianity, discipler?
- discipler0
everyone excercises faith, stphn. Some things just require a little more faith than others... like positing that something came from nothing.
- -scarabin-0
everyone excercises faith, stphn. Some things just require a little more faith than others... like positing that something came from nothing.
discipler
(Oct 13 05, 06:58)like god did.
- gruntt0
you've GOTTA have faith... a faith... a faith ahhh
www.bbc.co.uk/totp2/ fe... [jpg]
gruntt
(Oct 13 05, 06:53)Dont you need faith to believe eveything came from an "exploding dot"? There is more evidence against it than for it.
stphn(Oct 13 05, 06:56)
i assume you didn't click the link to reveal the George Michael photo.
- ********0
rule #1 moth, never use wikidpedia to support anything. it's for the people BY the people and loaded with bias.
discipler
(Oct 13 05, 06:57)Did you even read what I said?
- kelpie0
sigh... i've explained before that the question "who/what created God" is wrong. It makes a category mistake, like asking, "To whom is the bachelor married?". See, we have to learn to start questioning the question.
Only that which has a beginning requires a cause. That which by nature is without beginning, does not require a cause.
discipler
(Oct 13 05, 06:50)And no, the Bible isn't necessary to prove the science I support and believe. One need only chat with a biochemist or physicist to see the calculated and specified complexity.
...or walk outside and look around.
discipler
(Oct 13 05, 06:55)quotes science on one hand - evokes supernatural beings and philosophical mumbo jumbo on the other. So typical, your otherworldly get out of jail card :)
- discipler0
-10 for category mistake again, scarascholar.
- -scarabin-0
you know it's just as simple for us to say that matter has always existed as it is for you to say god always existed right discipler?
you should really stop using that argument.
- deep_throat0
You may as well use Wikipedia to argue your point.
determinedmoth
(Oct 13 05, 06:56)no wait, he's go that answeringgenesis website and the discovery institute!
http://www.discoveryinstitute.or…
now that website always freaks me out!
- kelpie0
convenient these "category mistakes" eh?
- discipler0
nah, kelpie... just following the evidence where it leads, without naturalistic bias. It's quite liberating actually.
If it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, maybe it is a duck?
Let's call a spade a shovel and move on.
- discipler0
convenient these logical fallacies, eh?
- kelpie0
what?!
*moves on gladly
- stphn0
i assume you didn't click the link to reveal the George Michael photo.
gruntt
(Oct 13 05, 06:59)i was referring to the george michael photo actually.
jk
- discipler0
wrong discovery institute, deep_goat. http://www.discovery.org
but, i don't expect you to be honest.
