Intelligent design
- Started
- Last post
- 690 Responses
- ukit0
Discipler, if you're really going to pretend that this debate doesn't have a political dimension, you are just being dishonest.
- discipler0
A) you make the error of assuming that a single board member dictates the views of the organization, and ignore the actual scientists doing research and
B) you ignore the other scientists and organizations not affiliated with Discovery, who are pro ID.
Again, biochemistry and physics are biochemistry and physics... can't do much about creating conspiracies there.
- ********0
now you're just being downright stupid. here so you don't have to use your narrow mind to read between the lines.
---
you really are one misguided motherfucker.
mrdobolina
(Oct 7 05, 11:24)this coming from a guy who calls me a frat boy meathead?
remember that statement above sir.
kOna
(Oct 7 05, 11:34)
---meaning. i'm far from being a frat boy meathead, so i'm telling you that you are a misguided motherfucker.
get it now?
- version30
unanswerable questions does not a god make
- ukit0
And if you want scientific evidence supporting evolution, a 5 billion year old Earth, etc., just open ANY SCIENCE TEXTBOOK. These are mainstream, accepted ideas not being challenged outside of Republicanland.
- discipler0
ukit, there is no question that there are some in this debate who have a desire to loosen the grip that philosophical naturalism/atheism has on the scientific community and science in schools - a far stronger grip than it should. And now, the scientific evidence is pointing in the opposite direction and some who want to see this change are embracing the science.
More power to em'.
- ukit0
Well, alright then.
- discipler0
yes ukit, there was also a time when scientific textbooks taught many MANY false ideas. Would you like a list?
- ukit0
Like the Sun rotating around the Eart?
- ukit0
I still can't get over this quote:
An insect remains an insect, even if it has an apendage which adapts to it's environment. You have no jump in genome.
-discipler
Your lack of scientific understanding is kind of amazing for someon who gets so fired up about this.
- mrdobolina0
kona, quit acting like a cunt. Im not a prude, you know it and you just wanted to start a fight.
you really are a fucking jerkoff.
- discipler0
That's actually an urban myth. ;) The church never taught that.
It's a prime example of people buying into something an uninformed academic guru tells them.
- mrdobolina0
discipler, do you know who Richard Mellon Scaife is?
- version30
i thought kona and dobs were friends and would rather see it that way again
you guys are both cool and people i would mention if talking about this board
now start making out like the lovers i thought you were
:)
- Dr_Jay0
http://www.cwru.edu/pubaff/univc…
2002 poll of Ohio (as middle of the road as it gets) scientists
So you're saying this is REAL science? Get real.
--Nine out of 10 scientists (91 percent) felt the concept of intelligent design was unscientific and the same number responded that it was a religious view
--A vast majority (93 percent) of the scientists were not aware of "any scientifically valid evidence or an alternate scientific theory that challenges the fundamental principles of the theory of evolution"
- ********0
well whatever mrdobs. i was just saying with my first post. you took it personal and it went from there so stop acting like i came out throwing punches.
sorry i took time away from your god/no god battle.
carry on.
version3. he and i were never friends.
- mrdobolina0
"well whatever mrdobs. i was just saying with my first post. you took it personal and it went from there so stop acting like i came out throwing punches."
you were just saying what?
- unfittoprint0
id?
still waiting for
this so called 'revolution/change of views'
this 'scores of scientists'
this so called 'facts'
in fact
just a 'folklorish' last attempt
to avoid the inevitable confront
with reality
by a dying creed.
- discipler0
um, ukit explain to me how the adaptation WITHIN A SPECIES, is unscientific.
- discipler0
unfitt
these things
take time.
Darwin's idea didn't catch on
right away either.
The proponents of ID are being careful and slow in their preparation for public consumption.