I ranted

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 5 Responses
  • ********

    My friend sent me this link about digital music and the end of rock snobbery and asked what I thought about it:

    http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=…

    Considering that digital music, politics and technological progress are my pet peeves I responded with this rant:

    I don't know - has VHS, DVD, TIVO, Cable, etc.
    fundamentally changed the way humans view and
    emotionally interact/imprint the medium of moving
    pictures? Are movies less emotionally personal now
    that you can watch whatever you want whenever you
    want wherever you want? Has that created fewer "film
    snobs" or more? Has the proliferation of Special
    edition and director cuts put MORE snobby information
    in more hands and served to raise the general
    awareness of the minitue of the art form for a wider
    population?

    Humans have always made music. It has always had
    emotional resonance with us, especially the songs that
    define our own experiences and the experiences of our
    particular generational trip through time. DOes
    digital music and digital music delivery systems
    threaten this fundamental human thing? Nah. It
    threatens an industry and a particular established
    form - i.e. Rock SNobs, who in turn, in typical human
    fashion try to stop and hold fast against change
    becaus eit undermines their a) livelihood and/or b)
    their sense of personal identification in relational
    and temporal ways.

    Maybe this generation will have a weird sense of
    identification with the iPod? Or particular websites,
    or those musical screen saver things in WIndows. Who
    knows. The LP cover, as great as it was, has slipped
    into irrelevance, and in doing so has gained a
    granduer in nostalga that it hadn't otehrwise
    possessed. SO why lament listening to an entire album
    as a primal and essential listening experience? Heck
    prior to the development of the LP and the technology
    that made such a thing feasible - not all that long
    ago in the history of recorded music - recorded,
    reproducable music was made on 45s and 33s - much
    shorter forms. The origin of "singles" predates LP's.

    Rock music in particular, and music in general is
    under no threat from digital recording and
    distribution. In fact, other than the actions of a
    distribution industry who is fighting this
    technological development tooth and nail to protect a
    dead and unwholly unneccessary industry, this is seen
    as a tremendous boon to the art of music in general.
    It's as if the blacksmiths had someone successfully
    prevented the establishment of an auto industry - "You
    are taking away our livelhood! You are using our
    precious metalurgical resources with no regard to my
    starving family! You don't respect the craftsmanship."

    The scary part is that the luddites are no winning.

    In political science circles a decade back it was
    fashionable to talk about the Developing world's war
    against Modernity, as indigenous societies had a hard
    time coping with and integrating tachnology from the
    modern West, and the attendant social paradigms that
    are needed to support the spread of such technology.
    Traditional societies are disrupted by the
    introduction of technology, and the entrenched ind
    established intrests tend to fight or seek to
    control/copot these forces to maintain the social
    hierarchy.

    It is both fascinating and frightening for me to see
    this same anti-modernity tendency now take root in the
    very nation that fostered the headlong ruch into
    modernity - The United States No nation was as
    pragmatic, practical and accepting of using technology
    and it's inherent progress (and the deep belief in the
    very notion of "progress" as a positive and life
    affirming value) as the United States was, especially
    throughout most of the 20th century. To see the
    anti-modern forces reclaim sections of the cultural
    psyche and political power is ominous.

    Part and parcel of this is the mainstreaming of
    "traditional" religion into political power positions,
    the undermining of evolution by quack "intelligent
    design" theories, the collusion between entrenched
    corporate intrests with these forces to seek to
    control and stop technological advances to protect
    their industries (music industry, media - the
    extenstion of copyright laws), the ties between a
    growing security state and these interests. It is the
    seeds of an AMerican Fascist movement.

    The most scary thing about the Bush administration is
    the loss of transparency in government - withholding
    the machinations of the process from view of the
    public - nothing could be more ominous and more
    un-american.

    Here's a question for you - what is the "AMerican way
    of life"? that everyone babbles about. I mean the
    touchstone on that is the two cars, your own home,
    etc. - all the material possessions and the access to
    the means to get them. But what was the AMerican way
    of life before America was a technological force? WHat
    was the American way of life in 1789, just to pull a
    year out at random. Or 1834? There was a distinct
    AMerican character and way of life - and it is far
    different from our current one it seems. If the oil
    gets scarce, and the government takes more control and
    the corporations protect their interest with private
    armies (don't think the re-introduction of mercenaries
    to the battlefield in Iraq is a fluke. Mercenries have
    been gone form the Western war making method since
    Napoleon. They're back. Ominous.) whither is the
    AMerican way of life?

    Sure, what does htis all have to do with digitial
    music, primary experience of said music and rock
    snobbery? Nothing. Or everything. Systems die.
    Americans should not be afraid of progress, or the
    rational assessment of and belief in the future. We
    are becoming afraid - both large and small scales. "Oh
    no! What will happen to my beloved rock snobbery! My
    knowledge of this tiny little world where I have some
    of my identity!!!" WHo cares. We're americans. Rejoice
    in the beauty of this stuff we can use and abuse. Mix
    it up. When we stop moving and stop believeing that
    what we invent today will make us better tomorrow - as
    opposed to thinking that we are by our own actions an
    dinventions undermining our own existence (i.e. fear
    of modernity - see also "apocalyptic thinking") - we
    loss something very fundamental about our national
    character, and open the door to older more sinister
    forces that have plagued society and civilization form
    the begining.

    Download. Kill Rock snobs.

    - Rant Over -

    -----------------

    I am insane.

    ********
  • ********
    0

    yeah, ok.. and you want me to read all that?

    i mean does it end with something like:

    "fuck you you fucking clown!"

    ?

  • ********
    0

    me too

  • designshowcase0

    summary please

  • spongebob0

    short version pls.

  • ********
    0

    in short:

    despite technological advances music has never changed. people always had a passion for making wonderful music.