logo huh?
- Started
- Last post
- 14 Responses
- jevad0
don't get it
- normal0
well then that's no good is it?
Back to the drawing board.
- blaw0
maybe if you worked with the "d" a bit it would make it more obvious to the viewer.
i find the overall look to be quite pleasing, but it is a bit cryptic.
- function820
interesting concept, but the average person will miss the point
- Dancer0
agreed with function, like the approach and you have thought about the form but it maybe too cryptic, keep at it though!
Good luck
- spendogg0
I dig it. just make sure the the NMD concept is reinforced. with legible type
- JoshClancy0
I like what you did with #2. Its pretty dope but the rest are not that great.
Keep playing good branding takes a lot of time and effort... especially if its for yourslf.
- b_magallanes0
Very cool idea....but it is a bit obscure. Looks more like "OOOD"...keep going, it'll come. Maybe start by adding some "corners to the n's and m's?
- blaw0
hey... i like that, b_magallanes.
- trooperbill0
kewl... thanks guys
- rabattski0
i like it. then again, imo a logo doesn't have to be understandable. but b_magallanes treatment does make it more readable. the only thing then is that the overlaping w's gets a bit lost since the other letters aren't overlapping.
- trooperbill0
wierd how we both picked green?
mark
- pablokorona0
i like your design better than the b_magicman's design. The other design incorporates a modern teardrop shape that is too recognizable and gives it less of a timeless quality.
its like how the beveled rectangle has lost its impact.
i like the logos and the idea just fine. but the 2nd and 3rd are the two better ones...
maybe work with the D, and try some looks with the name of the company under it.. cause you'll have to do that first in order for people to know the logo.
i like that idea tho.