Miss World 2003
- Started
- Last post
- 78 Responses
- jox0
exactly! aye to naturalness, nay to made-up-fake-boob-ugly-make-up-n...
I'm not saying they're ugly, but I bet that if I saw those girls without make-up walking down the street, I wouldn't turn my head for half of them.
- ********0
again, jox, your a genius, exactamundo!
- wendell0
what i must say when i see it , i see it here and aboard the comment now coming here. is it all the beauty that you may talk about OR is it about foreplay and sex. about taking these girls?? it is not a contest of sex but many many girls here have a whore style.?) exept miss romania who is may be more often that not naturale beauty! where as italy and holland etc are whores in the eyes and miond s of some peopl here, OR what you want them to be for money- or looking only!
- jox0
yeah, whore-style! ahahaha
- lj0
- peteski0
when in doubt -Venezuela. every time. I'm I'm not even about the olive skinned dark eyed hair thing.
NORTHERN Ireland is nice also.
Denmark's def. a first runner-up.
Belguim's just a barbie - go to the other pages kids.
- ********0
again all the African representatives are sad, that's a big let down. Corruption talks and shit walks. I know their surnames though they all come from the upper-class system of Bantu rulers.
- FUZCO0
I will take one of each...please
- nazeri0
CANADA!
Shes Persian to boot!
Yes!
- ********0
hehhe mixed chicks are best. best!
- zgraham0
sweden or norway LIKE WHOA!!
- ********0
Scandic chicks just have it in their blood. God that place is heaven for chicks.
- stewart0
Tanzania is going to loose for sure.
- jox0
I would say Sweden's contribution is among the ugliest girls ever to participate in a contest based on looks.





